Now is a good time to flood Wikipedia with donations. For the first time in my life, i have just donated to them and will do so again. You can do it too for a minimum of €2, no requirement for recurring donations or any nonsense.

    • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s not one single person in the world who should own a thousand million dollars, never mind hundreds of thousands of millions of dollars.

      The pure existence of billionaires is unethical and immoral - doesn’t matter whether they’re being stupid and fascist in public, or quietly pulling strings and bending society to their will in the background.

      • OrnatePotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Tangential, but I’ve always wondered why in English 10^9 is one billion. 10^6 is one million. Twice as many zeroes should be one billion. Three times as many, one trillion, etc.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Only in English is this weird naming system used and originally only in American English. You can put it in the pile over there with the miles and pounds and other oddities.

          Other languages have milliard between million and billion, billiard after billion etc.

          • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Miles and pounds came to America from England, but miles were the common system at least as far back as the Romans.

            Short form numbers are used throughout the English speaking world and are the international scientific standard.

            Why is is that you think that your system of squaring makes more sense than the system of a new name for every third power of ten?

            • Logi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Short form is used in English only and was reluctantly adopted outside of the US since the 'mericans weren’t going to budge. Any science done in other languages uses the more logical form. I’ve done it myself in 3 of them. And it’s weird how I fluently translate between American billion and international milliard or American trillion and international billion. But I’m sure there is going to be a rocket blown up over this at some point.

              Why more logical? Billion, prefix bi for 2 is million squared. Trillion, prefix tri for 3 is million cubed. Septillion, prefix sep for 7 is? Honestly, though, at the end of the day it doesn’t matter that much. It’s just grating that were being yanked backwards. However slightly. And yes, that pun was intentional.

              Sure, the US didn’t come up with the imperial measuring system but everyone else has moved on. Miles were used by the Romans but were they the same miles? Everyone had their own foot… the story about Napoleon being short was simply that he was measured in French feet and they were longer than English feet so he amounted to fewer of them. I guess it’s slightly better now that there is only one set* of archaic pre-enlightenment units in play :shrug:

              *having said all that, some of the US measurements don’t quite coincide with the UK ones but I can’t remember any if those details. But it’ll probably kill a other rocket too.

              PS I dare you to look up the Swedish mile.

        • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          From memory, when I was a kid, it used to be that a billion was 10^12, but I think most of the world changed at some point to adopt the American billion of 10^9.

          Edit: wiki article that discuss a little of this

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        But I want to quietly pull the strings of society so everyone can have food and housing security, get rid of food deserts, and end Elon Musk personally. Like, with my hands. Give me a billion dollars

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I don’t think you’d be a billionaire for long. I’d have that problem too. How can you just sit on a huge pile of money when you could do so much good with it? They are all like stinky dragons hoarding their gold.

          • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nah the billion dollars is a get out of jail free card.

            Oh wait you were talking about the stuff I wasn’t being facetious about.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      More that it’s a confirmation that having money doesn’t make you a good person.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago
      1. Rename to elonpedia for a day
      2. Demand the billion dollars
      3. Find a young attorney to sue pro bono on the grounds that Elon is a dick
      4. Laugh about the fact musk has to pay attorneys to defend himself in court.
      5. ???
      6. Profit.
        • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          38
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Are they really tho it just seems to me like you just really don’t like anyone with a differing opinion after a quick glance through your comments I could be wrong dare I say but after looking through your comments it looks like you think anyone remotely right wing is a big nazis facist boogeyman sure there are some people out there with those beliefs but there generally quite small in numbers

  • rawn@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s trying to distract from the probe into Tesla’s range. It’s working.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    We already have Dickopedia elon, it’s called twitter and YOU paid $44 billion for it.
    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    wikipedia foundation’s financials are solid, stable, and healthy.

    how’s twitter doing lately, elon?

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    To everyone thinking Wikipedia should go with the deal and then change the name back.

    It’s like taking money for doing d*ck tatoo on forehead and then doing laser removal, humiliation. No foundation or company should show they are craving for money by doing anything someone would pay for.

    • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, they’d be stupid not to take it.

      Imagine how much you could do with a billion. It’d perpetually sustain the organization, it’d allow them to hire translators and writers, resulting in better content for all of us.

      Hell, I’d take it, and 99.9% of people on this planet would too.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly, they’d be stupid not to take it.

        Did he offer them a legal contract? Because otherwise he’s just flapping his fat lips, seeking attention like a toddler.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        In practice organizations don’t have mechanizms to secure such amounts of money. It would be a massive cake to divide. Dirty money is dirty money, don’t show Elon Musk he can de anything.

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Worst case, they can keep chugging along without any changes, except maybe stopping the donation “nag”.

          • desconectado@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t think it’s immoral, but who in their right mind takes Elon seriously? Would you really accept 1 billion dollar from a known attention-seeker scammer, if you tattoo your forehead? No thanks.

            If this were coming from Jeff, or even a drug lord, I would probably be ok with it, as long as they are serious and without childish conditions.

          • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s honestly kinda perplexing.

            Everyone keeps talking about taxing the rich but when someone offers to give a nonprofit we all love a billion dollars it’s suddenly the worst thing on the planet.

    • jivemasta@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think you call his bluff, play chicken with him. See what he comes up with as his terms to the agreement, read the contract, have lawyers check it for loopholes and it they find one, sign the deal and exploit it.

      Then donate the money to another foundation.

      At some point I’d be willing to bet he would back down and not follow through, but anybody that is in a position to call him on his bullshit should do it

      • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No reason. It would require elon to be part of whatever position and he will destroy it like twitter.

        Also his endgoal is most probably to control what’s written about him

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    More evidence to support taxing the fuck out of billionaires. No one needs that much money.

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sounds like a good idea for a wikipedia page. Put Elon’s picture on it.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    For shits and giggles, the Foundation should absolutely get lawyers to put together a binding agreement to this effect and send it to Elon to sign.

    … and then watch him run away

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      And let him destroy wikipedia?

      You are aware that Musk isn’t doing what he’s done to Xitter because he’s stupid, right? That he’s very intentionally destroying the platform, and that was a platform purchased at 44 billion?

      Seriously?

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not like he’s buying it, it’s just an agreement on a change of name

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Idk, names are pretty fucking important to search engines.

          Although, they could pull an ultra 5head omega brain move and change the name alongside a policy that allows anyone to change wikipedias name similarly to it’s articles. Maybe let it last a week for notoriety, change the policy back alongside the name and pocket the money.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I guarantee if Wikipedia changed names today, there’d be 0 issues finding it even immediately after the change.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Probably, unless they accept even more ez money from Papa Musk for other stupid things.

      • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You are aware that Musk isn’t doing what he’s done to Xitter because he’s stupid, right?

        I can’t say I’m aware of that

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Troll him at the expense of the search engine that likely keeps them afloat.

          I don’t want Musk to influence social media anymore than he already has.

        • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why? They’re either born with the money or make the money, but either way the money has turned them into terrible people.

          • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’d argue that you have to be horrible already to have loads of money. Any reasonably good person would be using their excess wealth for a good cause rather than building ego rockets.

            • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Money = power, and power corrupts. I’m sure there are some people who are horrible before they become wealthy, but I think money (and power) has a way of blunting peoples’ empathy.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’d be willing to take part in an experiment to confirm this hypothesis. I’ll wait for delivery, each day until 3.