• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m under no illusions that Linux is a viable alternative for everyone, but if you’re just using your computer as a web terminal and light gaming system, a decent Linux system + Steam makes for a very usable option these days.

    I have exactly one computer in my house that has Windows on it. It was provided by my employer, and I turn it on maybe once every two weeks or so, for special-purpose activities that can’t be done on my Linux laptop. And most of the time, for most activities my Linux laptop is the clearly superior performer - it’s not even close, despite their similar hardware specs.

    I don’t think everyone should - or can - switch. But if you’ve got an old beater laptop gathering dust, try popping Ubuntu or something on it, see how it performs. See if it’s something you could legitimately switch to full or part time.

    • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is Linux still a good option for gaming if one were to not purchase games?

      • e-ratic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, you can either add the game as a non-steam game and force proton, or use Lutris or Bottles (with proton or other WINE runner). For repacks with installers, you can launch the setup.exe with Lutris or Bottles (install the game to ‘fake’ drive_c and move it), just make sure you include dependencies that require it (usually .net framework).

        Source: most of my steam library on my steam deck is plundered loot

        • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are also repackers like jc141 e LinuxRulez that also manage the dependencies and prefix for you. LinuxRulez also gives you appropriate Wine versions if needed

        • Pharceface@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to necro this thread, but lets say someone I know has gotten copy of a repack and when they try to install it with Lutris it says they don’t have enough disk space to run the installer, is it possible to create the wine bottle and specify the size of it before launching the installer?

          • e-ratic@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you installing it to the C drive? There’s directory called drive_c, which will look like a windows C drive.

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lutris is good for that. It can be confusing at first if you don’t know how Wine works, but it’s very easy to use and doesn’t require Steam.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find Bottles it’s less confusing than Lutris, (though it’s not UX perfect), and a better suggestion for people starting off with gaming.

          Though Steam is the number one suggestion. If all your games run through Steam then you don’t even need to worry about Bottles or Lutris.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Steam doesn’t do anything

        You can just as easily use Wine/Proton as your runner as you can set up Steam to use Wine/Proton as your runner

        • beatle@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not true, steam makes it incredibly easy. Install steam, tick compatibility option, install, click green play button.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lutris makes it incredibly easy. Install Lutris, tick runner option, install, click play button

            • beatle@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lutris is great, I use it myself.

              However, if you have a friend fresh from Windows who already uses steam and you say, tick compatible proton 8 or latest and click play vs install new software and then add the game you’ve already lost the easy battle.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        At this point in time, I only occasionally have mild issues with newest games, because Wine is a continuously developed software, and games with an annoying anticheat, such as Destiny 2 or R6 Siege. Everything else just runs, including older games, that don’t even run on Windows, or titles you had to sail the seas for

      • Zpiritual@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. I’ve run several modern … repurposed… games and it usually works through lutris.

      • Jumper775@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s great. Bottles is the best tool imo, lutris almost feels like a relic from the early days of Linux gaming, and non-steam games in steam don’t always work exactly how you might want, and aren’t so much fun. There is also heroic games launcher now which lets you add custom games and is also a very nice option if you don’t use gnome (bottles is a gnome style app so it may look out of place elsewhere). I would put some thorough research into VPNs if you torrent though because the one I used on my Linux box (expressvpn) leaked my ip at some point and I got a letter in the mail.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a gamer. I’ve used Windows since the 95 days. I’m done with Microsoft. I was not happy with Windows 10 and the bullshit they introduced but there is no way in hell I’m signing up for Win11.

      Steam has made a lot of progress with Proton. My next computer will be Linux-based.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s getting pretty easy to ditch Windows these days. Microsoft got too greedy and desperate, and actually using the damn platform they built is getting harder and harder, especially if you don’t want the nagging and annoyances that come from them trying to turn your computer into their subscription revenue stream. My impression is that Valve is aware of the problem, and wants to make sure that their store works regardless of which operating system you prefer.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is so true. I have a gaming laptop with Linux on it and a steam deck. If it doesn’t run on Linux, I don’t buy it. The problem is that strategy isn’t really saving me any money these days.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a real sense of relief whenever I close my (work) windows laptop and open my personal Pop_OS laptop… and then start up Baldur’s Gate.

      I’ve been primarily a Linux user for several years now and it seems like Windows is just getting worse and worse in terms of user experience. I fear the day that my company wants everyone to move to Win11.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Give me GOG Galaxy and Path of Exile on Linux and I would install it now. Last time I wanted to switch, I installed everything I needed, went to download GOG and remembered why I switch back last time. :(

      • Veloxization@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t need GOG Galaxy. I play my GOG games through Heroic Games Launcher on my Artix Linux system.

        Path of Exile is rated Gold on ProtonDB and according to reports works out of the box through Steam Proton.

          • Veloxization@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t view my achievements so I don’t know. I assume no because there’s no overlay. I actually forgot GOG even had achievements. I just don’t care about them that much usually.

            Steam achievements work normally, of course.

            • uranibaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess it doesn’t really matter anymore since I have what I need but Dead Cells requires a connection to their servers (which requires GOG connection if on GOG version) to get the three items from daily challenges.

      • rootzreggae@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t tried installing gog but I do play path of exile on Linux, with a controller. Flawless ( my distro off choice is nobara)

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with Linux as a desktop is that all the money and investment goes into server use cases. There really aren’t many companies investing into the desktop. I think Valve might he the only big company with a major interest in it, but they’re mostly focusing on their own closed ecosystem. It’s the classic chicken and egg problem.

        So if magically we see desktop usage go up, investment will go up, and we’ll see much more momentum.

        Regarding viability though, I think that’s not going to be solved with more investment. The problem is the millions of people making trillions of documents in MS Office. Microsoft goes out of their way to make it extremely difficult for competitors to achieve 100% compatibility. Unless that changes through regulation or something (since it’s clearly anticompetitive), I don’t think the hypothetical linux desktop wave will survive very long.

        Adobe, Autodesk, and a few others are also at fault for not supporting linux, but that’s a different issue. They’ll go where the money is, and if Linux usage goes up, they’ll have to support it or risk losing their strong market positions.

        It’s all an annoying chicken and egg problem.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maya runs on Linux. They’d lose tons and tons of customers if they pulled support. The rule of thumb is “if it started on IRIX then now the main platform is Linux”.

        • Angius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would be much easier to switch to Linux if it had viable alternatives to the most commonly used software, I feel.

          Unfortunately, Gimp still sucks monkey balls compared to Photoshop, and Libre Office, although close, is not MS Office.

          • gataloca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I’ve ever only used Gimp even when I was on Windows. I wonder what gimp could possibly even do better to compete with photoshop. There’s also krita of course which is very popular but I’ve never tried it, gimp has just been everything I’ve ever needed from a drawing program.

            • Angius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Non-destructive editing is sorely missing, a.k.a. layer effects. Adding shadows and outlines in Gimp is a chore, and if you dare edit the layer you added a shadow to, you need to repeat the process again.

        • uranibaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t some municipality in Germany run Linux on all their desktops but had to stop, not because any fault with Linux but because of compatibility? The money saved on licenses was lost on having to find ways to integrate with other municipalities and problems when others had problems with their documents etc.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Munich. Staff were happy with it, compatibility had nothing to do with it, and it definitely had nothing to do with the Mayor rubbing Microsoft’s back for moving their German headquarters back to Munich. Perish the thought.

            They’re more or less in the process of rolling back the rollback, though.

            Getting Berlaymont switched over would be the big get. Those people are writing memos advocating for the adoption of free software solutions and open document standards using MS Office.

            • uranibaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I remember reading someone responsible for the project saying something along the lines of hassle to send data to others. It could be another project or I could be wrong.

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is the millions of people making trillions of documents in MS Office. Microsoft goes out of their way to make it extremely difficult for competitors to achieve 100% compatibility.

          Yep. I’ve worked with LibreOffice, it’s not bad – but it’s not MS Office. Especially Excel, but even MS Word is better depending on your usage and how much you rely on things like VB macros. I’m in the process of trying out Linux distros to eventually move all of my machines over to Linux, but even then I fully expect to be running MS Office in a virtual machine on at least one of them.

          Fortunately, I like the older versions of MS Office and I don’t mind the extra setup, so it won’t be a problem for me. But for anyone needing the latest iterations of MS Office, it’s difficult to do on Linux from what I’ve seen so far, and maybe impossible for a total beginner without help.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ummm… I’m thinking more like two years for personal, and now for professional. I’m a professional, using Linux as my daily driver.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The software has to be developed and then it has to be adopted

            You can find companies running XP still just to avoid upgrading their embedded system

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of responses and none of them are false but the main reason for the improved gaming performance is DXVK, it translates DirectX 9 and 11 to Vulkan and is used by default on every DX9/DX11 game on Linux when you use Proton.

        The Vulkan stack on modern GPUs is much more optimized compared to DX9 and 11. It has gotten so bad that many Windows people use DXVK on Windows to solve performance issues and even Intel uses DXVK (or similar technology) for their Arc GPUs.

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        not OP but similar situation. My Linux desktop is just more snappy, despite being 5 years old (and the work Win11 laptop brand new). I already have customized with my shortcuts and apps. I don’t have to listen to the fan spinning up every time I open a new window (exaggerating a bit, but not much). Also I am not tied to work filters. If I want to read the news online for 5 minutes in a coffee break I don’t risk being monitored and potentially evaluated. But really, I’ve been a Windows and Linux user for 20-odd years. I’ve always found that Linux installed on the same hardware of Windows is just smoother and faster. Windows is getting so much bloatware (from MS or enterprise apps) that it doesn’t even have a fighting chance.

      • whileloop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably just down to less stuff running in the background using up CPU cycles. I can’t imagine it makes a huge difference, but more than nothing.

        • codanaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depending on the situation, it actually can make huge differences.  For instance, I built my computer in 2010 it’s 13yrs old now. it can’t run windows 11 and while it can run windows 10 it runs like complete shit. Start up would take forever even on a fresh install, half the time Windows freezes just trying to get to the desktop after a fresh reboot. at idle background processes from windows would leave me running over 50% CPU usage just idling and opening anything like Firefox and Discord at the same time would jump to 100% CPU usage.

          On Linux it runs just as good as the day I built it. Startup takes around 30 seconds and I can actually start working the moment I’m on the desktop, no freezing or waiting for background startup processes to finish. I currently at this moment have around 20 workspaces (aka virtual desktops) open across three monitors, within those work spaces is hundreds of tabs open in Firefox, simultaneously playing RuneScape and dwarf fortress. A bunch of terminals, SSH sessions, and other miscellaneous work stuff running. a ton of docker containers running, I also have both discord with a call going and Spotify playing in the background and I am setting at 30% CPU usage with the occasional spike to 50%. I can actually use my computer to do a ton of stuff and have power left over while windows would max out and freeze up just the start up, even on fresh installs. And it’s not just this one old computer, I can consistently see rather large performance differences going from Windows to Linux across the number of different computers. 

            • codanaut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m on Fedora 38 with I3 WM and a few kde apps, originally installed as 35 and just upgraded since. Before that was arch briefly and before that was debian.  I went with Fedora because I need my computer to work without issue when it’s time to work and on arch I spent more time tinkering and getting things working then actually working. I still think just plain Debian a solid choice and I use it on a lot of servers but as a desktop, I felt like I ran into a lot of outdated packages. With Fedora I’m getting up-to-date packages yet I have never had an update break the system.  I also prefer DNF and their repository over apt and deb files. It’s all just personal preference though. You just gotta try them all and see what you like!

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I appreciate you taking the time to describe why you chose Fedora; now I’m tempted to try it, lol. I’m downloading the 38 Budgie spin now and adding it to the list. (It’ll run like shit with apps until I upgrade the RAM on my Macbook, but the minimum hardware reqs are met and I can still look at it and see what it does out of the box.) Thanks!

        • captain_oni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, the file system. For the longest time windows used NTFS exclusively, which is (or was) slower than Ext4 (the most widely used on Linux).

          I think MS is moving away from NTFS and are going to use a different file system in the near future (maybe even now, I don’t know anymore)

          • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’ve been talking about replacing NTFS for a long time. 10 years ago they put ReFS in the server builds and… show of hands anyone using it?

            I think they were trying to make ReFS compete with things like zfs but 10 years later it still doesnt support compression, encryption, quotas or booting…

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think NTFS is the actual problem, but the Windows VFS layer (or whatever it’s called over there).

            Running windirstat (or similar programs) is dog-slow on Windows, k4dirstat eats through the same partition quite a bit faster. Getting metadata to sort a directory with what 5000 files by modification time can take minutes in explorer, with Linux it’s pretty much instant. minutes. That’s not just non-optimised that’s abysmal.

      • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Most desktop environments are really efficient at what they do and minimize the background resources they take. Just checked my system and GNOME takes ~350MBs RAM (~700MB including gnome-software) and literally 0.0% CPU, it’s insane. I looked up Windows 11 and it seems like it can use up to 4 GBs (!) of RAM all by itself.

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Memory management and file IO is far more efficient in Linux. So much so that I even got better performance in Windows running Debian in a VM for some very file-intensive stuff. And by better performance I mean a factor of about 10.

      • Qvest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My comment isn’t really a viable argument but I’ve been thinking about how an advert for Linux would be:

        “The top 500 supercomputers in the world run Linux, don’t you want to feel like having a supercomputer at home? Why wait? Get your Linux for free today!”

        Not really to be taken seriously, but if you want a real argument and example:

        My laptop is really laggy with windows 10, and it came preinstalled with it. Recently I tried dual-booting Linux and Windows, and Windows was simply too slow. I am so accustomed with Linux’s speed that I wiped Windows off it. Never again.

    • Mnmalst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @kescusay Just out of interest, what are the “special-purpose activities that can’t be done on my Linux laptop” if you don’t mind sharing?

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Running AAA games with kernel level anti-cheat (aka malware) would be an example.

        Windows-exclusive software like some ERP client, specific hardware drivers etc. Also, there’s no real alternative for Excel, unfortunately (LibreOffice isn’t good enough).

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna ride out Windows 10 since I’ve got it behaving and I’m lazy. But if Windows 12 is just like Windows 11, or worse, I’m switching to Linux and figuring out how to get a vGPU VM up and running for when I have to run something on Windows for one reason or another. I messed with a vGPU in Hyper-V on Windows and was amazed by how seamless the performance was compared to other VM GPU acceleration options. I found a project to do something similar on Linux, so I’m gonna mess with that. If I can get it running as well as I’ve seen in some videos, I won’t need a bare metal Windows install anymore.

    • ebits21@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you can put windows in a virtual machine for edge cases for most use cases. Use Linux for everything else.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux needs a Chrome OS type thing but FOSS with steam and it’ll be the best version for most users, and if it’s configurable unlike Chrome OS it’ll even serve power users

      (Chrome OS was actually really good imo, especially with their container method of running Android and Linux apps, but they moved it to VM, and it’s not as good functionally for some reason)

      • Mio@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know there is a Chromium OS out there that is not only for Chrome OS computers. I don’t remember the exact name, Google it.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chromium OS is the worst of both worlds (limited to chromium and you don’t get the ease of use from Chrome OS), unless you meant a fork of it, in which case I’m not aware of it and a Google search doesn’t give me any good results.

          (Though I still should have remembered chromium OS, but that’s on me being used to it being ignored because of lacking Android apps mainly)

    • bisq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would switch tomorrow if I didn’t play competitive CS that requires third-party anti-cheat like Faceit/ ESEA.

    • supercriticalcheese@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For most things I fully agree, unless it’s for windows specific applications that don’t exist in other platforms.

      What about Nvidia drivers for games?

      • gamer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nvidia drivers work fine, they always have (I’m using a 4090 on my fedora workstation). This is a common misconception.

        Nvidia’s drivers are a problem because they are not open source. This creates headaches for developers and the community at large. But for end users, they work just fine. Nvidia doesn’t just dump untested code on the internet and call it a day, they have full time staff dedicated to building and testing linux drivers.

        One recent problem is that the current latest driver is not compatible with Starfield. This is a common occurrence even on windows, and is why Nvidia and AMD regularly release “game ready” drivers before a major game launch. On Windows, Starfield crashed with the latest AMD driver for the same reason.

        Since it isn’t open source, our only option is to wait for Nvidia to release a new version. If it was open source, the community could fix the issue immediately without having to wait.

        • Madex@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          got a citation there bud? running a 4080 on endeavour OS and have same issue :(

          • gamer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you misinterpreted my comment. Starfield is currently broken, and we need to wait for a fix from Nvidia.

            • Madex@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah yeah sorry, when nvidia does when / how would I update driver, would it be a normal os update like yay -Syu I’m new and don’t understand it all yet

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One recent problem is that the current latest driver is not compatible with Starfield. This is a common occurrence even on windows, and is why Nvidia and AMD regularly release “game ready” drivers before a major game launch. On Windows, Starfield crashed with the latest AMD driver for the same reason.

          DX12 and Vulkan were supposed to fix all that, but apparently not.

          • gataloca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well it depends on your DE. If you run Gnome, you will probably be fine. If you run Plasma you can run into problems but supposedly Plasma 6.0 is going to release with full Wayland support at the end of this year (or beginning of next one) so lets hold our thumbs for that.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve been using wayland via Plasma for at least a year now and it’s been rock-solid. Granted, I have an AMD card and KDE is NixOS’ primary DE.

              If you run Gnome you’ll run into compatibility issues as Gnome devs have a “our way or the highway” kind of attitude. Like steadfastly refusing to implement server-side decorations. They want to use CSD for their stuff, that’s not an issue, but it’s another issue to not allow random programs to say “hey, server, I don’t care about my decorations, paint something suitable”. Especially for programs like mpv which don’t have a toolkit that could do such a thing for them, and mpv is not going to start linking to qt or gtk just to draw a title bar.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can have both. For instance Denmark is among the least religious countries in the world, and at the same time among of the most blessed.

        That’s a fine arrangement we’ve got IMO.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most blessed how?

            High living standard, low on threats like naturtal disasters and plenty food including Bacon and Beer. Low crime, high on all kinds of life quality/satisfaction indexes that I know of, among the lowest on corruption and poverty. One of the highest ranking on democracy and freedom of speech.

            It sucks here.

            Maybe for you, for the majority obviously not.

            • ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              People only like it here because they are mindless drones that blindly worship the system and hold the opinions that the government wants them to. It’s lame.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Funny you are saying that, at a time where the government is more unpopular than it has been in a long time. It’s unpopular on both the left and right, and even among members of the government parties. Sorry if it offends, but you sound a bit like maybe you’re in a dark place. Or maybe you are just trolling IDK.

                • ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, you are just living in unicorn and rainbow land. Denmark has a very close-minded and ignorant culture. People that have opinions that differ from the norm are labeled as “weird” or just simply cut off socially. Also, no matter what you say about the “government being unpopular”, Danes still blindly worship and defend ridiculous socialism and money-wasting policies in the name of environmentalism or the likes. Your response to my comments just goes to prove my point.

      • Joris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        At least google sites recommending Chrome are free to use. Microsoft is forcing is it’s useless browser to an audience via an OS. Which they paid for. Two huge no-no’s.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          MS should just quit the facade and make it free.

          I mean it more or less already is. I’m running an unregistered W10 Pro and the “activate license” thing only comes up occasionally.

          • moody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I heard from an acquaintance of mine that works for MS that they really don’t care if you pay for their software. As long as you’re using it, they know you’re locked into their environment.

            Hell, you can download an install ISO off their website directly, and you can install and run it without a license key.

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I think that much is really apparent. I use AtlasOS when I absolutely need to use Windows.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, they are doing both. The list of entities covered by the DMA dropped today.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not perfect by any means, but I’m glad to have it and can’t think of any other political organisation doing more “good”.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a mixture… forcing companies into roaming agreements, mandating USB C, CCS2, stuff like that.

      Then they propose laws to effectively ban end to end encryption.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but on the other hand, sometimes too much, with all the spying laws they wan to push every semester.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a case like this, I think they’re mainly worried that the dominance of [insert company] from [insert country] is getting too big.

    • mcepl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The huge difference between FTC and EC in terms of the mandate of their operation. Whereas the Sherman Law and FTC are operating with aim to protect customers’ rights or something like that, EC anti-monopoly law is oriented just on that: fighting anti-competitive behaviour. The problem is IMHO that “customer rights” is so flexible term, that (with good support in the campaign contributions, I am sure) it is easy to persuade FTC that almost anything you do is perfectly nice. EC’s anti-monopoly mandate is on the other hand rather strict and inflexible.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially when you hire a former Verizon lawyer as head of the FTC, and they do their best to dismantle it from the inside, and then the next person you hire needs to spend a bunch of their time rebuilding what was torn down.

    • CrazyCow@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      EU does seem to be on the forefront when it comes to user rights. It’s always nice to see them not just grazing over the issues

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is why third party add-ons have become required for usability since Win8. Classic shell or Startallback removes all the bullshit “improvements” and makes the system work smoothly.

        The only issue I run into is the occasional “Use Edge” bullshit they push out. It’s more of an annoyance than anything else.

        MS is not the only one with the shenanigans. Every tech company is pushing garbage on their customers.

        I swear I spend way too much time disabling the shit that the companies want me to use, so I can use the stuff I do.

        • HidingCat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree, I haven’t had to use any third party-add ons in Windows 10. And once Win 11 brings back the option to not minimise my task bar buttons I think I’ll be happy to switch. It was dumb to remove so many options in the first place though.

      • gataloca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even MS alone, it seems that my American colleagues are vendor locked in several different ways. It’s a bit bewildering honestly.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep. I remember some of my coworkers used to laugh at me saying “What bloatware? I don’t have any, nor the ads. We’ve used the same images, so it must’ve been something you’ve done yourself”.

        Turns out that’s because I chose en/us during installation process and our region didn’t have preinstall deals… yet. Now, they too can enjoy self-installing candy crush and literal KGB spyware.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This except it’s not limited to software. We exist at the whims of corporations.

    • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      better question is, how do I set my american to european?

      American folks really need to fight for their rights

      • RCMaehl [Any]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The change for EEA users doesn’t even work currently, so no one actually knows. I have a $50 bounty out though to figure out what’s needed once it does work though.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Use german/uk during setup, switch after.

      Btw, deskmodder has a slightly deshittyfied Windows 11 iso.

      • RCMaehl [Any]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This doesn’t even work currently. Despite them saying that those in the EEA won’t have to deal with Edge. I’m sure it’ll work eventually, just not right now.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Swapping out a large listmof unsolvable problems, bugs, and limitations for a smaller lost of very doable problems.

          And I say that as a 24 years Linux user who seriously only sees shit getting worse on the other side every time

          • geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            The average user wants their computer to just work, they want to open up their new Bluetooth headphones that their son/ grandson bought them and it connects as expected. Your definition of problem and what is solvable is very different to theirs

            • Declamatie@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The average beginner distro handles bluetooth headphones just fine. On Windows they do not always work reliably

              • geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anecdotally, I disagree with that. I’ve never had an issue with Bluetooth on windows. I struggle a lot with Bluetooth on ubuntu

                • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve had issues with Bluetooth on Windows 11, but it worked perfectly on Linux Mint. On Windows 11 the Bluetooth card would simply disappear after I put the laptop to sleep, only appearing at random after multiple restarts. It did work in Windows 10 just fine, however. Similarly, I had to change my WiFi card just for Windows 11. It kept disconnecting from network. Again, something that did not affect Windows 10 or Linux Mint.
                  If I didn’t have unused WiFi card laying around, I definitely wouldn’t be buying another one just for Windows.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s funny. I’m listening right now to Spotify music on my Bluetooth headset from my Linux desktop. I got like 5 different bluetooth headsets that I use on three different computers, all works flawlessly.

              So I guess I could say that that is actually not a problem?

              Edit: to clarify: Bluetooth worked immediately and out of the box on each of my computers, a desktop and two different laptops. All I needed to do was pair the devices and go time. I can pair whatever Bluetooth device that I want.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then what are you doing here in the comments of an article about yet another software company abusing it’s users for the nth time? Then go give your private data willingly to these companies.

              I don’t directly have a problem with closed source software if it wasn’t for they fact that any closed source software product that gets big gets abused and riddled with ads.

              That’s why, Linux.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nobody wants to deal with Windows either. It’s just the monopoly that has been pushed onto us that we’ve been forced to get used to.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I were on a court or jury, I would rule that repeatedly showing an annoying pop up until you press Agree, doesn’t count as actual acceptance of the terms, I don’t care what the rules are but fuck that practice.

    • elshandra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve just doubled down on not using Microsoft tbh. I shouldn’t have to spend so much time and effort cleaning a clean install of an OS. And have updates change things so they don’t work the same or at all any more, or you just can’t find them. Fuck that.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t this all get decided legally like two decades ago when Microsoft tried to do the same kind of thing with internet Explorer?

  • Gosnat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too late, I already shoved Linux Mint into my new gaming laptop and I’m glad I felt forced to do it, I’m having my first serious dive into Linux and I’m thrilled about my newfound project! I was so surprised over how very little knowledge you needed to have games running these days.

    • jernej@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are having battery life problems like I was I would recomend using powertop or tlp

    • Kcg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ha I did the same and jumped to mint also. Windows got so damn laggy such a shitty OS.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t even want the windows search results to include web links in the first place…

      • Belazor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s just a teeny tiny problem with that; disabling web search renders Search unable to do maths.

        It’s not an issue for me since I use PowerToys to get Spotlight-esque search in Windows, but it’s nevertheless hilarious.

        macOS search is so much better than Windows search it’s not even remotely close.

        • just_change_it@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          macOS search is so much better than Windows search it’s not even remotely close.

          Yeah but does macOS search use it’s own search engine to prop up user hit metrics and generate more ad revenue for Apple? I don’t think so. Score 1 Microsoft, our corporate tyrant.

      • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks!

        I haven’t used the windows search since forever, but if I ever need it again I’ll keep this is mind if I see the web results still bothering me.

  • Spiritreader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Round and round and round.

    It’s the same all over again. MS got a slap on their wrists with the browser choice tool they had to introduce in Windows 7.

    Then everyone forgot about it and they started forcing Edge on users. Now they get a slap on their wrist again and the same will happen in another 10 years.

    Don’t get me wrong, it’s really awesome and I’m glad that EU regulations actually have a impact. But I still wish for more, more permanent and stricter anti monopoly laws.

    • Never_Sm1le@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t get anything much harder than a wrist slap because Edge is not the dominant browser right now. Google just had a much hasher punishment with Android and Chrome

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to Microsoft almost everything from Microsoft is cross platform, because it works in both Windows 10 and 11. That’s good enough for Microsoft to be cross platform. I’m not even kidding!

          • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guys. This fellow here is missing a Lord of the Rings reference! Did you know that trilogy is 20 years ago now? Feeling old yet?

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lord of the Rings is from 1968, and I read it in the 80’s, and have seen the movies.

              I don’t see how that was a reference to either.

              • Bigmouse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s a movie reference. Specifically it references “The Lord of the Rings: The return of the King” at the end of the battle of Minas Tirith. It is said by Gimli, as a response to Legolas slaying a Mumak (giant war elephant).

                I’m sorry i don’t have a timestamp.

                Edit: It’s 2:50:49ish in the extended edition

                • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  OK I looked it up, and that is indeed a LOTR reference.

                  I just don’t get why people would make a reference out of anything as generic as that?

    • Resolved3874@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean they can require it if they want. Apple would just bury the fact that it exists and would use something that’s known to be shit. Idk how they could be forced to make iMessage cross platform.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here we go again, MS already lost a US federal lawsuit for the same thing but with Internet Explorer.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I definitely remember that in the news as a teenager…and then I remember everybody kinda shrugged their shoulders and forgot. And now Bill Gates = zoomer jesus after 20 years of PR work to turn his image around.

      • style99@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Somehow, everybody forgot all the dumpster-diving Gates did to “build” Microsoft in the first place.

        • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Crazy to think that Commodore’s BASIC was coded by Bill Gates, though. I was recently reading a programming article he wrote in Compute! magazine back in 1984, when MS ascendance was anything but guaranteed.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly, they didn’t lose. They almost lost, appealed and ended up with a settlement which didn’t require removing IE from Windows or prevent tying other software to windows.

      On November 2, 2001, the DOJ reached an agreement with Microsoft to settle the case. The proposed settlement required Microsoft to share its application programming interfaces with third-party companies and appoint a panel of three people who would have full access to Microsoft’s systems, records, and source code for five years in order to ensure compliance.[29] However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor did it prevent Microsoft from tying other software with Windows in the future.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp