$700, and the side by sides look barely different, from my perspective. The chat seemed to have the same opinion.

    • CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I personally find it pretty horrendously insulting they put out a “Pro” console that can’t play the fucking game discs unless you pay them for an additional accessory.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not a console gamer, but I’m sure they looked at the statistics and saw most players don’t buy a physical disk anyway. Why make the machine more expensive for an accessory that probably isn’t being used. On my computer I haven’t had a physical disk drive in probably 15y and haven’t ever thought that I needed one.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, sure, but that’s also because on PC I can choose to buy DRM-free games and have guaranteed backwards compatibility for the foreseeable future. Plus it’s not a closed system based on a console that launched with a drive. People (me included) already own PS5 discs, not from a previous generation, but from this one. It’s bad enough that I need to keep my PS3 around to play PS3 games, it’d be absurd to not be able to play PS5 games I already own because the thing is physically unable to ingest them out of the box.

          So yeah, for people in that position the Pro is a hundred bucks more expensive than it says on the sticker, which is already a ridiculously high number.