$700, and the side by sides look barely different, from my perspective. The chat seemed to have the same opinion.

  • CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I personally find it pretty horrendously insulting they put out a “Pro” console that can’t play the fucking game discs unless you pay them for an additional accessory.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not a console gamer, but I’m sure they looked at the statistics and saw most players don’t buy a physical disk anyway. Why make the machine more expensive for an accessory that probably isn’t being used. On my computer I haven’t had a physical disk drive in probably 15y and haven’t ever thought that I needed one.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, sure, but that’s also because on PC I can choose to buy DRM-free games and have guaranteed backwards compatibility for the foreseeable future. Plus it’s not a closed system based on a console that launched with a drive. People (me included) already own PS5 discs, not from a previous generation, but from this one. It’s bad enough that I need to keep my PS3 around to play PS3 games, it’d be absurd to not be able to play PS5 games I already own because the thing is physically unable to ingest them out of the box.

        So yeah, for people in that position the Pro is a hundred bucks more expensive than it says on the sticker, which is already a ridiculously high number.