For those that have poked around other fediverse stuff beyond Lemmy, and been around the spaces awhile, what’s stuck out to you as stumbling blocks, or basic user experience fumbles? Which parts do you think may be technical, and which may be cultural?

  • RobotToaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    netsplits/defederation.

    You can’t just tell someone to register for any server, and they will be able to see everything. So they then have to choose a server, which takes effort, and can cause analysis paralysis.

    • GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe that is exactly what we need to do, to spare them from the indecision. Recommend them to a specific instance to sign up and follow you (if in doubt, the instance we use). I suppose we can mention there are lots of choices, and those who are inclined that way will want to explore other servers, many are not, and for them pointing them at a server may be best.

      I’m just thinking that trying to say there are lots of networks, each with lots of servers etc, may be the problem.

      Alternatively, should ask them some questions like do they want to post short format or long text format, and take into account a specific interest they have, and then we still recommend a server instance to them to join.

      So for fellow ham radio operators, I just pointed them all to the ham radio Mastodon instance and said sign up there.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but then the blocklists themselves become a centralized feature. I’m not saying “don’t block the fascists”, just that it’s going to be hard to maintain a blocklist.

        I can totally see the Fediverse going the way of email, as in you need a reasonably large amount of capital to maintain a well-respected, not defederated-from server.

        • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          By ‘sane blocklists’ I meant small and auditable blocklists actually. There are instances like programming.dev, lemmy on sdf and the instance I’m on that don’t preemptively defederate from other instances. That’s what I meant.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean that Lemmy and the Fediverse is not big enough for Russian troll farms and US ad agencies to start up massive numbers of instances and drown us in bullshit, like with email. If it goes that way, blocklists will sadly not be enough.

            • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure how this hypothetical issue that may happen in a far future relates to what issue I addressed in my comment, actually.

    • danisth [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The ability to “float” between servers would go a long way to improve this. Make an account on one server, then come across another that you vibe with more, and single button press and you’ve transferred. All you subs, comment history etc are preserved (for overlapping federated servers). No idea how to implement this, but it feel achievable, perhaps with a quick step to set up a new password and username if it was taken.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once the fediverse gains significant traction there will be a huge coordinated media smear campaign to associate it with extremism, CP, violent crime, terrorism etc… The “won’t anyone think of the children” attack will be leveraged to ““regulate”” the fediverse (probably by legacy social media like Meta alongside the security state), aka transform it into regular old centrally controlled social media. Upload filters, encryption back doors, know your customer laws etc… Non-regulated decentralized social media will be attempted to be made illegal, not sure if it will succeed.

    So yeah eventually any true decentralized social media will have to move completely into the “darknet”.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. Onboarding
    2. It lacks the critical mass to accumulate more users
    3. Account migration / excessive defederation
  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Controversial and probably unpopular opinion:

    • the biggest hurdle the fediverse faces is that it’s not run by a business with monetary incentives to make it more popular and doesn’t have any marketing / market research / product managers focused on gaining users.

    I’m someone who hates advertising with a burning and seething passion, and I’m no lover of capitalism, but from a systemic standpoint there’s a reason most open source projects burn out and go nowhere, and for-profit businesses have a higher chance of survival, because there’s direct incentives (you know money/food) to keep making commercial software and increasing it’s user base, but there isn’t for hobbyist and open source software. Especially in the case of a social network that is only as valuable as the content and users on it, this might be a long term systemic issue.

    • s20@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      most open source projects burn out and go nowhere, and for-profit businesses have a higher chance of survival

      You know like 50% of new businesses fail within 5 years, right? I don’t have stats on open source projects, but it seems to me those are more likely to fail because they’re run by one person who loses interest than because they don’t have a profit motive.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know like 50% of new businesses fail within 5 years, right?

        Yes, that is a remarkably low failure rate. 99.9% of open source projects sit unused and abandoned after 5 years.

        those are more likely to fail because they’re run by one person who loses interest than because they don’t have a profit motive.

        They’re run by one person because they don’t have a profit motive, so they don’t need to hire QA, market research etc. etc. All the parts of a software company that help to keep continuously developing their software and make sure users are happy.

        • s20@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dude, yes, they’re run by one person because it’s a hobby. This is like saying 99.9% of stories don’t get published because there was no profit motive. There usually isn’t when it starts, just a drive to create or fill a perceived void, or even just practice. I write damn near every day with zero profit motive.

          Linux wasn’t started with a profit motive. None of the open source BSDs were either. As far as I can tell, they’re still not particularly profit motivated. Neither are a lot of other open source projects that have lasted ages. Where’s the profit motive behind Bash? It’s been around for 34 years.

          An inability to pay bills can stop a person from working on a project, but at the end of the day it’s usually not profit that keeps an open source project alive. It’s popularity and passion.

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            None of what you wrote argues against what I wrote. I didn’t say that open source projects can’t be successful, I pointed out that they do not have the same structural incentives to continue or to keep changing to suit their users.

            There also haven’t been many open source consumer facing applications that have seen the success that backend and low level systems have. Largely because stuff like Linux / BSD / Bash / etc are built to serve specific functions with clear technical criteria that can be specified, met, and checked off a procurement list. Social networks and consumer facing applications on the other hand have to delight their users and keep them opening them up rather than any competitive distractions. That’s not a clear technical problem that an engineer can crank away at and implement, that’s an ongoing fuzzier problem that requires more stuff along the lines of continuous market research and product development.

            And while yes, in some cases it’s just purely popularity and passion that drive open source projects, in many many many ongoing open source projects it’s in reality, corporations funding their development (directly or through employee eng time) because they’ve built some of their infrastructure on it and it’s cheaper to pool infrastructure resources than try to build their own version.

            It’s a nice narrative that Reddit became Reddit just because it was this greatly built platform that served as the perfect forum for everything, but the reality is that during Reddit’s growth face they did a ton of stuff to juice usage, like create fake comments and manipulate upvote downvote counts to make it seem like more people were engaging with your stuff, etc. And Reddit still exists as a competitor that is actively trying to take Lemmy’s user base back. Don’t get me wrong, I’m here because I prefer a transparent, non-engagement driven algorithm and am doing my part to contribute here and not on Reddit, but I’m also not blind to the structural headwinds that Lemmy / the wider fediverse will have to overcome.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are a lot of fediverse projects that could really really use some marketing to explain what they’re doing and who they are for. And for developers, hey, I hate corporations but I’m generous. I would absolutely subscribe for features or perks or whatever.

  • Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    what’s stuck out to you as stumbling blocks, or basic user experience fumbles?

    For Lemmy:

    • Onboarding. Newcomers should not have to decide which instance to use. They know nothing to make that decision. An algorithm should make an educated guess. Even a random pick might be better than forcing them to choose. Manual choice should still be available as an advanced signup method, but the default should be as quick and simple as possible.
    • Account Migration. The lack thereof only increases the pressure for making a good choice for your first instance. If we could easily migrate accounts, this would also ease the signup burden. 3rd party tools exist, but this should be a core feature.
    • Discovery. There exist dozens of tools for discovering communities, which shows how bad the built-in search function is. This should be a core feature with no need for 3rd party tools. I should not have to care wether someone else from my instance already searched for the same community or wether I’m the first.
    • Stream Aggregation. I signed up to loads of niche communities (which do get new posts), but never see any of those in my stream, no matter which mode I choose. I even started to unsubscribe from big communities to give smaller content a chance, to no avail. This effectively hides original and interesting content from view, and makes the overall experience more boring.
    • Remote Instance Posts and Comments. When looking up a specific post or comment, I probably cannot do so while being logged in. Which means, I can read it, but cannot interact with it.
    • Remote Instance Communities. When browsing the communities of another instance (for example, a themed instance like mander.xyz), I can only do so while being logged out. When I find an interesting community, I have to manually copy the link, search for it in another logged-in tab, find it again, to finally subscribe.
    • Lack of Niche Content. It’s getting better, but we still have a long way to go. This probably needs more general growth, but some technical aspects (like Stream Aggregation, Discovery and Remote Instance Browsing) also make it harder for niche communities to gain traction.
    • GDPR Compliance. A private person and a public institution (which publishes educational content and videos) explicitly mentioned to me that they cannot join Lemmy since Lemmy cannot assure GDPR Compliance. I don’t know wether that’s true, just reporting the reason.

    Overall, it still requires significant willingness to either accept missing features and content, or jump through technical hoops to regain some.

    My experience on other fediverse platforms was similar, which most often resulted in me staying away from that particular service for now.

  • Quicky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Onboarding. The fact that you have to choose an instance to join while creating an account is essentially forcing people to make a decision for which, unless they’ve done some reading, they’ll have no idea of the implications. It’s such a weird concept for new users - they have to know about a thing before they’ve had experience with a thing.

    Even if it doesn’t really matter which instance you begin with, the experience will be different, and there’s a sense of “pressure” at the point of signup, which doesn’t exist outside of the Fediverse.

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even if it doesn’t really matter which instance you begin with, the experience will be different, and there’s a sense of “pressure” at the point of signup, which doesn’t exist outside of the Fediverse.

      Would you not say it’s more like it doesn’t exist to the same degree? Not that that diminishes your point, mind, only that in my experience online I’ve found similar when it comes to other online communities, say when deciding different Discord servers to join and some requiring waiting, reacting to be able to chat, or more rarely, have 2 factor authentication enabled of all things.

      Before that, and more a sign of my age I guess, it would have been different forums, different chat rooms, and the like. Each similar in basic functionalities, but different experiences and a different sense of “pressure” to each.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it’s the same with Discord because you already know which server you want to join, even if there are hurdles.

        With federated instances you are told they all do the same thing and that it doesn’t matter, but in the same breath you’re told there’s still criteria to consider (number of users, location, some have a main theme etc.)

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see this going the way of Minecraft servers. Little banner ads that explain a community’s perks. Heh. This is a concern to me too, and the effort involved is what’s keeping me from joining and posting on other Fediverse apps immediately, and I’m putting it off.

  • modulus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biggest issues for me are:

    1. No centralisation means there’s no canonical single source of truth.
    2. Account migration.
    3. Implementation compatibility.

    No single source of truth leads to the weird effect that if you check a post on your instance, it will have different replies from those on a different instance. Only the original instance where it got posted will have a complete reply set–and only if there are no suspensions involved. Some of this is fixable in principle, but there are technical obstacles.

    Account migration is possible, but migration of posts and follows is non-trivial, Also migration between different implementations is usually not possible. Would be nice if people could keep a distinction between their instance, and their identity, so that the identity could refer to their own domain, for example.

    Last, the issue with implementation compatibility. Ideally it should be possible to use the same account to access different services, and to some extent it works (mastodon can post replies to lemmy or upvote, but not downvote, for example).

    • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No centralisation means there’s no canonical single source of truth.

      I don’t think this is a bad thing. Having centralization leads to one narrative taking over the post. With more decentralization, there is a natural way for different kinds of conversation to take root.

      Also, this is going to occur much more when people get the ability to block instances anyway.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be nice if people could keep a distinction between their instance, and their identity, so that the identity could refer to their own domain, for example.

      This is one of the ideal use cases for Solid, in development by MIT and Tim Burners-Lee. Basically, you host a central store of data, including one or more user accounts, and allow access to it from other services.

      • mnrockclimber@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This was the original premise of app.net - a social service from years back. They built a “social backbone”. They offered you a single place where your identity and friends were housed. Other people could build apps on top of the backbone.

        So you would join say a clone of Instagram and all your friends were still there. And your account still worked. Or they had a Twitter clone. Same deal. It was a single sign-on social account/identity/social graph that was separate from the apps. So things could just plug in.

        Worked great. But it was a paid service. And came out right at peak Facebook so it died off.

      • Extinction Studies@hcommons.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Feathercrown @modulus

        I’d be more comfortable with self-hosting my actual data somewhere, and just having an instance or the central store point to my data. I’d want to get to apply rules for who gets access to my data. It would be a lot easier to spin up a small data store with a few tools on it than a full instance.

    • Rescuer6394@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only the original instance where it got posted will have a complete reply set–and only if there are no suspensions involved.

      that should not be true. if all the instances involved in a comment section are fully federated with each other, the comments are the same on all of those instances.

      things get complicated when there is defederation involved… but the base case is “everyone can see the same set of comments no matter the instance.”

      is this correct or there is more?

      • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        things get complicated when there is defederation involved

        More of that, only comments from instances defederated by your instance won’t be shown.

      • modulus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I can tell, this is incorrect. If there’s a post on instance A, a reply from instance B, and someone on instance C follows the OP on A but not the RP on B, they will only see the OP without the reply.

        Source: I very often notice this because I run a single-user instance, and when I open a thread it’s incomplete, lacking posts from instances that I have not suspended.

  • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For me, aside from picking initially between kbin and Lemmy and then picking an instance (and the whole concept of instances), it was not having an algorithmically created feed. It took a bit to wrap my mind around since all of the social media apps and sites I was used to (and still use) provides this.

    I was confronted with building my own feed by topic of interest (aka community or magazine) or else.face a firehose of all content from all local or federated instances. I mean, I did it, so it wasn’t that big a barrier, but it still required effort and conscious decision making on my part just to set up the thing to be usable. It’s probably one of the reasons why I don’t use Mastodon that much, because it’s easier to join/subscribe to topics in kbin and Lemmy (at least in my experience). Mastodon seems to be for following individuals and organizations, and that’s even more work (for me).

    • Jomn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      One way to deal with this issue in Mastodon is to follow hashtags instead. Personally, it is also not for me, but it is still better than following individuals.

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, aside from picking initially between kbin and Lemmy and then picking an instance (and the whole concept of instances), it was not having an algorithmically created feed. It took a bit to wrap my mind around since all of the social media apps and sites I was used to (and still use) provides this.

      This is kind of an interesting one to me, not because I disagree or anything, but because at least personally, when I’ve tried to use corporate social media, I felt like I also had to do a lot of manual feed building/curation to get it to be worth anything. However, I do think where some of the algorithmic stuff helped a little was in the suggestions of similar or related pages/users, albeit somewhat rarely.

      More than the algorithms it was simply the fact that it was a single platform where you knew they might be & so could search for them, so maybe it was a mixture of those details for you too?

  • ɐɥO@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    defederation. Set up my own instance to choose myself on who I want to defederate with

  • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The platforms copied the design of centralized services without making enough adjustments to accommodate the different UX that a decentralized federated system brings. Some things that I think should be standard that currently aren’t:

    1. I want to be able to send search queries to other instances from my instance and have the results displayed back to me.
    2. I want to be able to browse the timelines of other instances from mine.
    3. PeerTube has a “remote subscribe” option where you fill in a little box with your @username@domain and it’ll open a window on your instance where you can follow the channel; I think this should be polished and then it’d be great.
    4. Every platform should support hashtags and instances should be aware of each other’s hashtag usage so the search can be smart and recommend sending queries to instances where the hashtag you’re looking up is most commonly used.
    5. Links to known Fediverse instances should open on your instance where you can interact with it rather than taking you to their instance where you can’t.

    Implement these and the experience would be much better.

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Extremist political propaganda from instances like Hexbear, Lemmygrad, and Exploding Heads.

    I won’t recommend it to anyone in it’s current state.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I guess I’ve made too many enemies from those communities and I suspect that my username has been put on some brigading community. Almost every comment gets downvoted instantly and my inbox is filled with pro-Tankie DMs and threats.

      It’s kinda funny but I feel like Lemmy has run its course for me

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I don’t fully share that sentiment, I acknowledge it’s a point frequently brought up.

      So, looking for a compromise … is there hope in growth? Like, with numbers big enough, it should become feasible to have an instance which strictly blocks all political leanings of ‘your despised flavor’, and still have enough content to look at.

      Would that be a solution for you, for example @awwwyissss@lemm.ee or @PP_BOY_@lemmy.world? Lemmy as a whole would still have ‘bad stuff’, but there would be a ‘clean instance’ which you can recommend, from which no ‘bad stuff’ can be seen.

      I simply skipped thinking about better wordings for ‘some expressions’. Please bear with me. I didn’t mean to judge.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah if there was a stable instance that filtered political extremism well I might recommend it to others

  • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lack of documentation.

    Recent example is Firefish. I love the platform, and I’m okay with discovering stuff on my own, but I can get why other people can be lost without exhaustive documentation

    • Kotking@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Blaze @ALostInquirer Yeah documentation is reaaaaaallyyyy lacking. Mastodon you kinda understand if you look enough, but Misskey … If you don’t use feature you won’t find any information unless someone wrote a guide which is problem in it self as guides most likely are notes so it won’t be easy to find one. Add to that error messages that don’t explain problem, like why people can’t make response to Kbin thread after some time(some did, some get error) https://imgur.com/a/3wjEcCb

  • guts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is this trend of mass downvoting your account if you disagree with political propaganda on any spectrum and they follow any instance. We need a workaround for mass downvoting.

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    1. I need an extensive guide on how to find the right Fediverse spaces for the social experience I’m trying to get. Ie. App marketing, instance marketing

    2. The Fediverse needs to offer, on the surface non-technical, things that corporate social medias don’t currently offer.

    Ie. Killer app features