The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that it has developed a four-legged robot designed to jam the wireless transmissions of smart home devices. The robot was revealed at the 2024 Border Security Expo and is called NEO. It is built using the Quadruped Unmanned Ground Vehicle (Q-UGV) and looks a lot like the Boston Dynamics Spot robot.

According to the transcript of the speech by DHS Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) director Benjamine Huffman, acquired by 404 Media, NEO is equipped with an antenna array that is designed to overload home networks, thus disrupting devices that rely on Wi-Fi and other wireless communication protocols. It will thus likely be effective against a wide range of popular smart home devices that use wireless technologies for communications.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sounds like cops are getting sick of being shown during their raids on home camera systems.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I’m glad you brought up the doorbell. Once the jammer dog is jamming, it’s impossible to ring most doorbells and choose the polite option. It’s 110% murderville from that point onwards.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      …. and display/video

      D’Oh!

      I always tried to prefer hard wiring where possible, so this shouldn’t block my cameras. However it just hit me reading this that all my displays are wireless. I’ll get the video but won’t be able to see it

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This roaming robotic jammer was first contemplated after a child sexual abuse suspect used his doorbell camera to see FBI agents at his door serving a search warrant. The gunman opened fire on them from behind the closed door with an assault-style rifle, killing two veteran agents and injuring three more.

    Fuck pedos and abusers, and I’m sorry for those agents’ families’ losses, but it sounds like they went in without having done their homework on who they were arresting.

    And now the rest of us have to pay the price for half-finished police work—on a single case—with an authoritarian ”solution.”

    ACAB.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have the same attitude for cops as I do Zionists.

      Zionists - if you hate 1200 dead, wait til you hear about the 40k dead in Palestine.

      Cops - If you hate the ~50-60 murdered cops over the last year, wait til you hear about the 1100 or so civilians murdered.

      I can be sympathetic to deaths of any kind, but not when they’re martyred explicitly to dehumanize and justify violence against the masses.

  • regrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    Now ppl just need to jam the controller/video frequencies it uses to counter it.

    Disclaimer: don’t do this unless you want the FCC knocking on your door too

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Isn’t that interesting…

    The anbility to prevent the getting-out of evidence of what the authorities do to the locals…

    Just like the unconstitutional state-laws which criminalize capturing-of-video-evidene of police executing people…

    “I wonder” if this would ever be abused by anti-accountability authorities…

    ( remember that the whole Christian religion is founded on a guy who was a kind of whistleblower, & had spikes hammered through his wrists, in his crucifixion, for his calling the legalists “hypocrites”…

    I wonder how “Christian” he’d find them to be, if he returned, & saw what they’re doing? )

    Human nature & demon nature seem … related?

    or is that too harsh?

    … perhaps … but wasn’t the Inquisition demon-law in the name of benJoseph?

    hmm…

    _ /\ _

    • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      While I agree with the anti-authority statement, I have to say the rest of the post is approaching incoherence. This reads like you did translation party on some apologetics texts.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    wtf, I bet it would work equally well for thousands of dollars less if their jammer didn’t come with a robot dog.

    activating the HVAC system to introduce chemicals into the environment and cause a fire or explosion

    Someone’s been reading comic books and raiding the edibles again

  • shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Stop using wireless security cameras. Burglers do this too. It doesn’t take a robot dog to carry around a jammer.

  • lemming741@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jokes on them, Uptime Kuma pings my doorbell cams every 5 seconds and starts the self-destruct sequence if they aren’t reachable.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      For real security, you basically have to. Even without this, jammers can be used by thieves to disable wireless cameras and security systems.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      WPA2 (and I believe 3 as well) are notoriously easy to crack the passwords to. Wired is truly best for security, and for wireless WPA Enterprise can help with securing the network

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t believe this is the case. 3 is fairly robust, and 2 is still just brute forcing, though rapidly on a local CPU. The one that’s trivial is trivial to crack is WEP.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          WPA2 is pretty trivial too. Not as easy as WEP since you do have to locally brute-force the PSK (password), but that’s pretty quick on modern systems. We had multiple assignments when I was in college that had cracking a WPA2 password as a step (in the interest of time, the instructor used passwords from the RockYou list but still)

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, if you’re using common words or variants thereof, you’re gonna have a bad time. But a 128 character string of random characters is going to be functionally safe from such an attack, for now.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              And you’ll go crazy every time you try to add a device that doesn’t support QR code scanning.

              Just use multiple dictionary words with a symbol or two thrown in. Or go all out and set up 802.1x with client certificates and save the PSKs for a firewalled segment of less important crap.

              Although it’s worth mentioning that wireless security means nothing to jamming. Jamming is RF, it’s destroying layer 1 before WPA matters.