Also, the defence argued that impaired persons operating vessels “propelled by muscle power” are somehow not morally culpable. Like, because, why?
Also, the defence argued that impaired persons operating vessels “propelled by muscle power” are somehow not morally culpable. Like, because, why?
I mean I’m a Midwestern American, people being absolutely shit faced on a float trip is just the norm over here. I don’t like that, but I’m not surprised it’s not illegal.
Not American so I may be misunderstanding, but isn’t it either at least a DUI, or sometimes a special BUI, in every State? Your federal/state jurisdiction is still something I struggle with.
Also, regardless of legality I bet enforcement is impossible for float trips.
It does get enforced around here, but only in certain areas. If you’re paying for a float trip out here, you’re also paying for a cop free route.
Different countries, different precedent, but I think the Canadian case hinged on the vessel being powered. Even if it’s a paddle, it’s muscle powered.
I know there are different standards for barges under tow than for the tugs doing the towing. If the courts are extrapolating these rules to the smaller end, than a float might be okay. You’re just cast adrift, usually with alcohol.