Also, the defence argued that impaired persons operating vessels “propelled by muscle power” are somehow not morally culpable. Like, because, why?

  • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Different countries, different precedent, but I think the Canadian case hinged on the vessel being powered. Even if it’s a paddle, it’s muscle powered.

    I know there are different standards for barges under tow than for the tugs doing the towing. If the courts are extrapolating these rules to the smaller end, than a float might be okay. You’re just cast adrift, usually with alcohol.