pancakes

But that whole argument follows the logical fallacy “whataboutism” to downplay X because Y and Z also do bad things. Just because you perceive something to be in line with a standard baseline of corporate shitiness doesn’t mean it’s not worth criticizing.

As for individualism, it’s no secret that lemmy is somewhat left leaning which contributes to the general vibe. From my experience there is a lot more nuance and depth to the discussions that happen here when factoring in population size compared to other similar areas of the internet.

I disagree. Nintendo isn’t just some company that has legal beef and comparing their shitiness with Blizzard’s is like comparing apples to oranges.

Nintendo is a litigious bully and patent troll that has a long, long list of hurting the fans that love their games. They don’t just settle for cease and desists, they historically ruin people’s lives (see Gary Bowser). What feels even worse about Nintendo is the complete misaligned of their product/ brand vs. how they treat fans. You can point to similar companies like Disney and I say that yes, I would happily cheer on any misfortune that comes to them with the same fervor as Nintendo.

That’s like whining that everyone hates Blizzard or Ubisoft because of some hive mind mentality. Could it be that maybe it’s just a commonly hated company based off their unethical actions over the last 10+ years?

I don’t want to advocate for shoveling money into any company, but if you could sell your steam games it would screw over indie devs in a big way. Many games made by small studies or one person don’t have as much content as AAA studies and would be far more prone to a small handful of copies being distributed back and forth on the used market instead of each being a sale that goes to the developer.

Some devs would see a drop in sales as much as 90% and I just don’t think it’s worth it to shoot the gaming industry in the foot like that.

I’m a simple man. I see “Nestle” and my rage knows no bounds.

To me, it wasn’t so much about each DLC making a huge impact or the story being amazing. It was more about already playing the game to death and then gaining access to more content to explore. Kind of like eating a delicious cake, still being hungry, and then finding another slice of that cake that was sitting out all day.

I would argue that all the fo3 and oblivion DLC were decent. Some obviously better than others, but they weren’t just soulless cash grabs. They had effort go into them, and were fairly new into the DLC space so some trial and error is to be expected. They had a pretty good amount of content for the price relative to the base game, compared to the starfield DLC/ current AAA norms.

I love Jerboa, it most closely resembles RiF from the beforetimes.

Personally, sixth thing is my favourite of the things.

Also it’s easier to onboard new people when the UI closely resembles what they’re used to.

Amazing that you can tell. They all look the same to me.

He just got approved for that big $40+ billion compensation package from Tesla so he’s got lots to work with.

If anyone here is desperate to suck at the teet of a corporation, it ain’t me.

And yet…

Was there ever an implication that “no problemo” was Spanish? I’m from a country with 0 Spanish influence and it’s occasionally used. I just thought it was because it rhymes.

“You will keep running drills until i say otherwise!”

Or contribute to society at all really

Also Tom and Will are both Scientologists (or were, I don’t keep up) so that part at least cancels out.

I think it’s that 10 years is a long time, it isn’t when it comes to something we love. A truly loved game is a game you’ll want to go back and play 20+ years later. 10 years is when games just start feeling nostalgic.

Clearly yours is because that’s not a normal response to someone asking a reasonable question.

Chorb