I’ve read different defenses for JavaScript for cases like this, which usually runs somewhere from you shouldn’t be doing that anyway all the way up to if you just understood the language better you’d know why. While I agree with both of those points strongly as general principles, JavaScript also violates the principle of least surprise enough to make it concerning.
For what it’s worth, I do like JavaScript. I really don’t think that there is any perfect programming language.
You may just need to adjust the sensitivity of the safety reverse on the door, but to reiterate what everybody else is saying, working on garage doors tends to fall squarely into the camp of “if you have to ask, you need to hire a professional”. I do a lot of DIY around my home the garage doors are something that I won’t touch for anything but the most basic adjustments.
Windows on the front end and Linux on the backend isn’t uncommon these days. Big iron unix is expensive so it was largely moved off of, although there is still some Windows in the back end depending on vendor. I think Epic is Windows across all tiers.
Plus all that stuff Einstein went on about, curved space time and stuff.
Yep, decompiler is the correct term
Because it’s not easy to amend the Constitution.
I’d like to see the research.
Unfortunately, this is a weak security practice that really is used everywhere.
This we can agree on.
I’m not going to go down the route of arguing whether or not the bank should allow it to be easy to change your email address, but if somebody has compromised your email with the intention of compromising your other accounts, they are going to change the email addresses and passwords on those accounts before you have a chance to react, and you’re going to be on the phone with each one of those institutions anyway. You don’t hear a lot of this happening anyway, because it’s usually a lot safer to con somebody out of their money than it is to smash and grab out of their accounts, and probably as easy if not easier.
As for the sporting goods store, I can imagine a couple of reasons for their decision, but it probably has as much to do with spamming your email as it does security, if it has anything to do with security at all.
I don’t know your specifics, but implementing adequate security and being mildly infuriating often go hand in hand by necessity.
Let me grab a couple of coconuts to clap together and it’s on.
You’re going to wear this out to the bars and clubbing, right?
I think I agree with you both. I’m not a Node developer; could you keep your SQL objects/components in a separate file so that they don’t clutter up other logic?
How exactly would that work? Keep in mind that the blockchain is by necessity not secret.
Your first example isn’t actually using the present tense, it is using the infinitive form “to lead”.
Fair, I haven’t used Rust so I don’t really have an opinion on it.