No, I would tell you to avoid Ghent at all costs then!
Just make sure to avoid Brussels. Belgian myself and I hate the place.
Stopped there for a day on the way back from Spain. The walled Hamlet is beautiful, especially nice to stroll through the streets after dark.
I mean, yeah. Only one of both groups had both experiences.
Child free people love to shit on an experience they know nothing about, sure parents are ready to reply to those.
Nobody is telling people to have children…
It’s not about the absorption. They get soggy/slimy if you don’t immediately cook them
Not true. Some countries allow it on a national level, but many do not. I believe The Netherlands allows it, but only at lower competition levels.
I think FIFA forbids it entirely, but I’m not entirely sure.
I use syncthing, which works great unless you need a ton of space.
If I copy McDonald’s site one by one for my own restaurant and just change the name, you can expect to be sued.
And yet, their site is available publicly?
Could send it over ATP - Avian Transfer Protocol.
Does require a USB stick and for your friend to train a pigeon though.
I still don’t see how that makes Firefox difficult.
The transition might be difficult, but I rarely see casual people use the options you describe.
It’s as easy as opening the shortcut and start browsing, I see no difference with Chrome there
Why would Firefox be difficult to use?
I just don’t get how someone convicted for ELECTION FRAUD can still be a presidential candidate
Pretty much everyone here agrees that it’s a shitty concept. Doesn’t solve anything and it’s a privacy nightmare.
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don’t have enough info (or for images).
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
I tried out.
All the options you give are allowed, only what OP shows gives the error. While it seems like a good idea, seems the implementation is terrible and only filters out the most obvious ones.
Kagi is great, but I just can’t miss $5 a month for it.
I’m using Qwant now and it’s pretty good.
I pay my delivery drivers exactly 0 tips. They’re paid a living wage, no tips needed.