Why do we give companies the power to do things we don’t agree with?
Why do we give companies the power to do things we don’t agree with?
Because business majors only know how to exploit good things that would be better off without them.
If the good thing is left to just be better off without them – while they fuck around with a separate thing – then people will never be interested in the business majors’ product.
It means I open the site, and I can’t read the article because it had some obligatory signup.
Granted, this was on mobile. On desktop it seems I can read it.
I don’t care.
The site doesn’t want readers, I’m gonna go back to reading memes.
Nursing/Kindergarten or something? Isn’t that about that high?
I mean it still works for getting attention, but it’s not exactly respectable and there are some people who really don’t like them.
Nope, it’s 30 \ 24 / 08
Rhowch, mwyn, and wnffre are Welsh. The rest is nonsense.
There are tolerated quirks, and then there is insubordination. Defying US Copyright Law would have been the latter, it was not tolerated.
Few Eastern and Southern Europeans give a shit, Northern Europeans are all in, way more votes per capita. Sweden rallying together a whopping 0.13% of the country.
Wasn’t that misreporting?
If you’re talking about being forced to code as in “make the game work on it’s own without the server”, I’m thinking a “working state” includes “here’s what you need to run the server privately”, no more coding should be necessary.
Idk if you were thinking they’d be legally compelled to convert server based multiplayer games into peer-to-peer, but that’s not how I see it.
It should also not be legally possible to prosecute restoration work to make unsupported games run on private servers.
Does Vanguard not seek testing and validation by Microsoft before pushing updates?
I saw the recent video from the Task Manager designer Dave’s Garage on YouTube, lack of thorough official validation seemed to be an important part of the CrowdStrike problem.
Too bad it happened only after the competent staff was gone.
How do SSDs and HDDs compare to optical disks in terms of stability in storage? SSD bits can lose charge over time until a lot of 1s read as 0s, right?
Just call then out on it in talk by mentioning why you would add it.
Alternatively make an upgraded English-only wiki alternative with way larger article max sizes so we can finally evolve it past 2005. And start using YouTube links and not (just) a native video player. And start quoting/including entire chapters from relevant books.
GEMA aeems to be doing a lot of shit I don’t think should be done, like charging for live performances of GEMA-owned music. I also don’t see why there should be an organization with memberships? That’s not at all related.
I’m also not pitching an organization at all, I wouldn’t expect an additional one to be necessary. It’s just conceived as a legal framework change,
When I’m talking about starting companies, I’m talking about several, not competing through the size of they’re libraries, but rather through other things like cost, quality, UI, searchability, recommendations, etc.
I am not talking about a concept for a company, I’m talking about revised ethics to inform revised laws which could perhaps enable what you seem to describe Grooveshark as.
I think the DMCA experiment has gone on long enough and it’s time to try to mitigate the negative results of it through a different approach.
Business majors just get more authority than they ought to. They should be treated more like secretaries and advisors in most cases, not bosses.