I was actually kinda pissed when I had to switch to a car with a CD player and couldn’t use it anymore.

It was kinda funny when lemmy was just taking in the reddit exodus crowd and people were complaining that their front page was full of German and Polish posts.

Festivity Doctrine, if you will.

Ternary computing is some serious alt-history fodder.

From what I hear, the war spending is still pretty low, all things considered. This could just be another autarky subsidy.

It’s like he became the opposite of King Midas.

It’s incredibly annoying, though, that you can only copy boards in the app, and when you do it makes triplicate of all the cards.

Why steal data when you can just make it up!

Podman breaks the retroencabulation.

Yeah, I heard it was the next big scifi trilogy, but when I read it it was like “Really? This?”

You’re doing the thing in the post.

Appropriately for the thread, the WP scene had a choice: walk away. It kept telling Walker to walk away. The player could have shut the game off.

That’s the pivot point: if you’re just playing a game about Walker, then having a choice doesn’t matter, you’re just being told a story about a lunatic. But, if Walker is a stand-in for you, and you’re playing the game “because you wanted to be something you’re not - a hero”, then not only is playing on a choice, choosing to play war porn in the first place is a choice.

In development and science, sure. But this is a finished product on the market.

A flying tachanka, looks like.

Or, yknow, don’t.

You mean decacelsius?

HowardBealeRant.avi

It’s not very much like Arcanum, though. Arcanum and Planescape are moer or less straight RPGs, Disco Elysium is practically a variant of a point and click adventure.

The problem isn’t the effect, the problem is you don’t seem to understand what it actually does. The idea is to reduce the price in such a way that a small discount appears larger, increase sales, and make the reduction back in volume. It works, and makes sense, and is done, if and only if you compete on price and trade in volume.

Your title is, at the time of writing: “People live their whole lives watching corporations end prices with 99 yet when they list their own items for sale they choose a whole round number and never question it.” This thread is full of people giving you reasons why they don’t or wouldn’t do that, meaning they clearly do question it, and are deciding against it.

Not if the intention is to make it look expensive. Bugatti’s don’t sell fot 499999.