I have no idea how true this is? It is just a random shower thought.

It may be more true where I am in Canada than in the US? Here, senators are essentially appointed for life. I understand US senators are elected but have longer terms and generally more stable careers than their counterparts? In either case, there seems to be a lot of prestige that comes with the position.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 天前

    In the UK the house of Lords is like that but in Australia the upper house has 6 year terms and have to go for reelection. Seats change all the time. Very few are safe seats.

    • tunetardis@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 天前

      I think the Canadian system is very much modelled after the UK?

      That’s interesting about Australia though. Btw I understand Australia has a ranked voting system in elections? Curious about how well that works. Our first-past-the-post is a nightmare with vote-splitting sending the “wrong” representative to the capital.

        • tunetardis@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 天前

          But doesn’t it resolve the vote-splitting problem? For example, a common scenario here is you have a right-wing candidate winning in a a left-leaning district because the left’s vote is split across more than one political party. Wouldn’t a ranked system solve that dilemma once all the dust has settled?