I’m a FOSS (free and open source software) contributor and enthusiast. So I prefer to use such products (Lemmy instead of Reddit, Linux instead of Windows, Firefox instead of Chrome, Signal instead of WhatsApp, you get the idea). Was just thinking that if everyone moved to such solutions, the tech and ad industry would lose billions of dollars. That would translate to governments losing billions of dollars in tax revenue. Would such a move ever be encouraged then by the governments?

  • sh1ggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If that is the case then how is Lemmy/the Fediverse going to be financially sustainable in the long run?

    • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smaller communities taking care and paying for themselves and just using federation to talk to everyone else. But yeah, I don’t think anyone has a really good answer for that yet. Everyone is against advertisement here and any other way of financing other than donations. Donations work well as long as the admins have fun with their work and are willing to do it for free.

      • Thunder_Caulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are the chances that the instance owners join together and buid a cartel or corporation. Then sells our data.

        • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fairly little right now, right now nobody cares about lemmy. They don’t need to sell your data because all the data on the fediverse, especially /kbin and lemmy is available for free via the API to everyone to take. Nobody would pay for it.

          • Thunder_Caulk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Besides the unsettling idea that we are like a message board in public display. It’s good to know that our data are somewhat immune to being monetized. .

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              We are never immune to being monetized. I guarantee right now there are MBA chucklefucks who’s jobs are hinging on finding a way to monetize the fediverse, and then implement it. Meta is working on the right now. The question is how do we defend our spaces from corporate bullshit.

              • Bongles@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it depends on how much the majority of users end up caring. Anytime something gets fucky, anybody in the world can create a new instance, or new community and if users care they can move to and support that one.

    • OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Donations, people always give Wikipedia as an example. You need to chip in every now and then. Wouldn’t that be better than “free” but your every click, scroll and interaction being tracked and you having an advertising profile being built in the background?

      • sh1ggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That makes sense, but Wikipedia is one “instance” instead of hundreds. If many instances start depending on donations and you are subscribed to even just a couple of them, donating to every single one could seem a little much, right? Not trying to be negative, just starting to wrap my head around this.