• TheBest@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    "India is on the cusp of electrifying 100 percent of its rail lines, while China is nearing three-quarters of its network. Over 57 percent of the rail system in the European Union is electric. The US, which has historically prioritized personal cars over high-volume passenger trains, now can boast that it has two electric trains — and more on the way. "

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They must not be counting light rail which is electric.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_rail_in_the_United_States

      "The United States, with its 27 systems (as counted by the Light Rail Transit Association), has a much larger number of “true” light rail systems (not including streetcar systems), by far, compared to any other country in the world (the next largest are Germany with 10 and Japan with 9).[1]

      According to the American Public Transportation Association, of the roughly 30 cities with light rail systems in the United States, the light rail systems in six of them (Boston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Portland (Oregon), San Diego, and San Francisco) achieve more than 30 million unlinked passenger transits per year.[2]"

      The problem with light rail here is excessive heat makes the overhead wire expand and when that happens, it sags causing the trains to have to slow down. :(

      In the winter, the problem is snow and ice blocking the lines and the switches.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        In Portland, the biggest problem light rail has are assholes parking on the tracks.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’d think with current battery tech we wouldn’t need the overhead wire anymore.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Batteries are heavy and expensive. A wired power source is so much more efficient for rail it’s barely worth discussing.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            And have a much shorter lifespan than catenary wire or third rail.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          The best use of a battery on a train is a small one to handle junctions. You disconnect from the wire at the end of one set, go through the junction, and then reconnect at the other side. Saves a lot of ugly spaghetti wiring.

          Otherwise, no, just use wires.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            You don’t even need that. Every electric train I know of has pickups on each car, and any break in the catenary or third rail is short enough that it can be bridged naturally by two cars, or sometimes even just one, if it has pickups at both ends.

        • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          That would mean that instead of an engine, you’re lugging around a battery pack, which is just as heavy while giving you a fraction of the range of an engine. Not to forget that battery cells have only a finite lifespan.

          Meanwhile, OHLE gives you infinite range and room for major weight savings. Plus you can keep running the same power system for decades.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Battery and hydrogen-powered trains exist, they’re mainly used on less frequented lines because it would be more expensive to electrify them.

      • LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe we should reanimate John MacDonald. Not to be a politician or give him any legitimate power (for obvious reasons), just give him a bat and make him a CN lobbyist.

        Surely we’d get our rail soon.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    electric trains are an over one hundred year old technology.

    lol. lmao, even.

  • RangerJosie@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    No. We’re not even on board with trains as a concept outside of the context of heavy freight shipping. The people are. But big oil spends a lot of bribe money to make sure you can’t easily ride a train across the country.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Big freight train spends a lot on bribing too, to avoid needing to spend even more from being required to improve their services.

  • ProxyZeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t wait for the US to finally have decent public transport, I hate having to drive for everything

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish. The US is endlessly far behind on public transportation.

    Talking to my own family members around the US, they only have eyes for their enormous gas guzzler pickup trucks that they use to run to the grocery store down the street.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We don’t need public transportation, we have something better, personal transportation… We also have a robust network for air travel that will take you anywhere in the country in a few hours.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can have both. Europe has a great mix. So awesome to have the option to take the train or bus. They also have awesome road infrastructure in most places. Try comparing an American freeway to a German freeway. You feel like you’re in a third world country when you come back to the roads in the States.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personal transportation is extremely inefficient. You need to pay a bunch of money for something, in order to get around, and it is always space inefficient, bad for the environment and encouraged parking lot creation over housing.

        • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It literally takes me exactly where I am going using the shortest possible route, no detours, stops or transfers, in the shortest possible time (excluding jetpacks or helicopters), that is peak efficiency of a mode of transportation.

          • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re missing price. Compare your trip to Public transit costs, and include infrastructure costs. You had to pay for your vehicle, your car insurance (which in the US there are irresponsibly low legal minimums), registration, gas, and also taxes for the infrastructure, to get yourself somewhere which takes up more room than needed (usually several times more room than a combination lf walking and public transit). Public transit only requires fare pricing, along with infrastructure, which is significantly cheaper per person due to more efficient use of space.

            Compare many European metro cities to the US, and you’ll notice their public transit is more convenient (in the characteristics you have pointed out) because we decided to shut ourselves in the foot as a country and forced everyone to have to get a car payment, while making public transit bad.

            Of course, public transit isn’t convenient for every area, such as rural towns in which personal vehicles are a better solution, but we have many cities where there should be significantly better public transit.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            shortest possible route

            No. That would be a straight line like a train.

            no detours, stops

            Lmao. Whatever. Don’t stop, genius.

            the shortest possible time

            That would be high speed rail.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          And even better! All this got rid of those pesky winters

          And replaced it with an extended hurricane season.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        People driving around in personal tanks is not “something better”.

        It’s dumb, privileged, unsustainable, unhealthy, violent, and literally destroying the planet.

  • coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Now that the US doesn’t rely on auto manufacturing as its main industry, people are coming around on trains.

    But, what’s that rule about headlines ending in a question mark? 🤔

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t understand this article. It talks as if these trains in California are the US’ first electric trains.

    Our light rail here in Portland OR is electric.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      And it’s better implemented than LA’s. Our system has stations in the middle of barren areas in many places. NIMBYism is a cancer in California.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s only one solution for the US. The world’s fastest bullet train network. Anything less will not do.

  • Beaver@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The new red line between San Francisco and San Jose is the newly built electric rail line.

    The coloured lines are electrified railway. It really does stick out, its good progress.