• D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I swear I think of this every time someone mentions kde should just fix bugs. I follow Nate’s blog weekly and try to keep track of any other work that is going on. 90% of any kde release is polishing, bug fixing, and refactoring or outright replacing old code that was causing issues. For some reason, people seem to consider colors changing from blue to red a new feature.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I guess you meant this as a joke, but for clarification, I meant no big changes such as new desktop edit mode. I wish the team would just focus of bug fixes and enhancements without introducing new elements or changing things up in a big way like this.

      • carzian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        This isn’t a joke. Often times rewriting features like this will allow the code to be more streamlined and use the latest KDE library features. This is brining new features using modern and more maintable code that solves long standing issues. Fixing the old code sometimes isn’t worth the effort for a variety of reasons (based on unmaintained libraries, the original code might have been written a while ago so it’s had many revisions of fixes that necessarily complicated the code, etc.)

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You misunderstand me. They can write new code and be ready when the bug hunting phase is over. The end user only gets bug fixes. Later they can backport any new feature after the phase.