Amazon finds $1B jackpot in its 100 million+ IPv4 address stockpile | The tech giant has cited ballooning costs associated with IPv4 addresses::undefined

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is no way to personally identify anyone. Right now advertisers have to jump through hoops of cookies and browser fingerprinting to identify you- which can be blocked.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They still wouldn’t. A single computer address is not an individual. They’re only slightly better off compared to knowing the edge router IP like they do now.

        If you really want to protect against that, then use a proxy or an onion router. NAT was never meant to do this, and it does it poorly.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          A single computer address is not an individual.

          It is extremely likely to be the same user. Shared computers are rare today.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            So what? They still don’t have much more information than the edge router IP. Again, if you want to protect yourself here, use a proxy, onion router, or VPN. NAT is not designed to tackle this, and does it poorly.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In a large cooperate network, or even a small network, there’s nothing fixing a device to a specific network address. You can shuffle those around between people entering and leaving the building and device power cycles just like DHCP does for IPv4.