Amazon finds $1B jackpot in its 100 million+ IPv4 address stockpile | The tech giant has cited ballooning costs associated with IPv4 addresses::undefined

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    They still wouldn’t. A single computer address is not an individual. They’re only slightly better off compared to knowing the edge router IP like they do now.

    If you really want to protect against that, then use a proxy or an onion router. NAT was never meant to do this, and it does it poorly.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      A single computer address is not an individual.

      It is extremely likely to be the same user. Shared computers are rare today.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        So what? They still don’t have much more information than the edge router IP. Again, if you want to protect yourself here, use a proxy, onion router, or VPN. NAT is not designed to tackle this, and does it poorly.