I posted this question because I once saw a tweet that said something like:

“If you use adblock, you don’t care about creator’s point blank”

What is your opinion on this? Do you agree with them?

  • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course. And I’ll continue to do so as long as advertisement is detrimental to my online experience. If it wastes my time by forcing me to watch an ad before a video, if it distracts me from reading a text because of animations, if it tries to scam or shock me, I’m better off blocking it. I’m not against advertisement as communication that a useful product or service exists, I’m against advertisement abuse and greed.

    I’ll happily pay for, donate to, or otherwise support services important to me that need and deserve it.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use AdBlock (and SponsorBlock on YouTube, and a cookie whitelist and a JavaScript whitelist) because only I decide what to see on my screen.

  • solitarius@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • I don’t like getting bombarded with ads.
    • It hides scam ads.
    • If the creator of something makes something I like I prefer to directly donate to them instead of giving up my privacy, and letting a company like google profit of it, and then they only give a small portion to the creator.
    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This “you don’t care about creators” is a sham argument designed to make you feel guilty. I hear this about piracy a lot. “You’re depriving all those blue collar people of a paycheck!” meanwhile the WGA has been on strike for weeks because big studios are screwing them over on pay. It’s the corporate executives that are screwing these people over not some individual who downloaded a torrent or installed an adblocker. One only needs to look at who is funneling all the money into their own pockets and it surely isn’t the general public.

  • infamousbelgian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been with this idea for a very long time. But over time all the platforms got more and more greedy and I had the feeling that my privacy got more and more invaded.

    Since that time, I have an Adblock and use DDG.

    Sorry content creators.

  • LSlowmotion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well if I want to support creators, I would rather give them my money directly either by buying their merch or any payment plarform.

    Nowadays ads are so intrusive. Also the way ads are delivered by knowing what I prefer is capitalistic at its finest. Not everything that I search are something I want to buy.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, because I don’t like subjecting myself to propaganda and having to hope I’m smart and strong enough to recognize it and avoid succumbing to it.

    “People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you. You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity. Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head. You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.” - banksy

  • M-Reimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use ad blockers everywhere. I hate ads and wouldn’t buy anything advertised there anyway.

    • _cnt0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I avoid ads whereever and whenever I can. If the stuff I can’t avoid is particularly obnoxious, I make a mental note never to buy the product even if I need something of the sort.

  • Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmao what a stupid argument. If you want money paywall your content and see how many people really want to see it. You do not have the right to fill anyone’s head with manipulative garbage propaganda just because you made a video about how much you love the second reich and want it to retvrn or wrote some shitty blog post.

    People that call themselves CONTENT creators are the people churning out pure garbage for the bazinga-brained sake of contentcontentcontent and the quality of actually worthwhile shit would skyrocket if they would all just collectively quit because what would be leftover are the people who actually care and aren’t in it for some ad views.

    Artists, critics, musicians, designers, etc etc? They don’t call themselves content creators like the bazinga-brained influencers in it purely to chase metrics. Tell the bazingas to fuck off.

  • Sigma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the argument feels like guilt tripping poor people for not making their masters richer. if you only care about getting paid, I do not give any fucks about your content because it’s probably garbage anyway. it seems the only “content” people like this produce are shitty hottakes of them ranting about something they don’t understand.

    tl;Dr if your content is just a recording of yourself then it’s accurate to say I don’t give a shit about the content creator in that scenario.

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also, at least in my experience, the people who most have a problem with this and make statements like “adblockers are piracy” or “adblockers kill creators” tend also to be the people who put dick pill and crypto ads on their website. The people most in favour of ads tend to be the people using the least tolerable ads on their content. In the same way that people who spout “no censorship anywhere, free speech at all costs” whenever their social media posts get removed tend to post content that serves as the best arguments for websites needing ‘censorship.’

  • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The internet was always a place to share. The recent move to monetize everything is destroying the internet. So no, I don’t care about content creators being paid. Even so, ads are annoying, they take up my time, bandwidth and break pages and are so completely irrelevant to me.

  • tvmole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    As the de facto IT guy for my family, I block ads on all their computers just as a basic safety measure.

    I can usually spot a fake download button and avoid scammy sites, but my parents and grandparents seem magnetically attracted to them

    • funnyletter@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plus there are ads now that give you plague just by loading them, which is uniquely horrifying to those of us who are informal tech support. D:

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah and I don’t feel bad about it a bit. Few YouTubers have said that by donating one dollar they’re profiting more than if you watch hours and hours of their ads.

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t do a thing without ad blockers. I decide what junk I open and what I watch. When a site has ad blocking detection, it’s not worth my time, ever. Ads are the cancer of the current society. When I have something, ads are useless, when I don’t have it, ads are equally useless, as I don’t want and need it.

    When creators of content create good content, I pay, same for apps. Ad companies leaching of the creators content need to be banned. (Those companies earn a lot more then content creators on those ads)

    When there is an adblocker that will trigger the payment without me having to watch the ad (or even pull it over the web) I’m fine with it, else, no ads revenue. I pay for my data subscription, I decide.

  • Moghul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes. I hate ads that interrupt my experience. Whether they’re midroll ads, baked-in ads, animated banner ads, cycling banner ads, or popup ads, I don’t want them. The least annoying of the invasive ads are baked-in ads because I can skip them.

    “If you use adblock, you don’t care about creator’s point blank”

    Correct, I don’t care. Run ads that don’t bother me. Have a sponsor logo in the corner, do a video reviewing their stuff, whatever. Your options aren’t just to annoy me.

    • mintyfrog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This.

      If you’re a creator or platform that runs intrusive/invasive ads, you don’t care about users