• rosymind@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t really see how people chosing to be barefoot has anything to do with their ability to make eye-drops, unless the aforementioned people are using their feet to do it

    • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      Being barefoot could potentially introduce extra risk of contamination from shedding skin cells; this may or may not matter depending on which part of the plant they’re working at. In clean room environments, people usually wear special clothing that prevent cross contamination; these include special coat, hair netting, and extra layer of covering around the shoes. But if the said employee works in the office on administrative tasks, far away from clean areas of production, who cares?

      • rosymind@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I see. I figuered as long as they’d wear hair nets, masks, coats and gloves it shouldn’t matter what’s going on with their feet- but I suppose that could make sense? Idk, It still feels like a strange thing to be fixated on…

        I didn’t read the article, though

        • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          I work in a hospital pharmacy, and I had to compound some custom eye drops for a patient the other day. I have to wear a hair net, beard net, shoe covers, a gown, and sterile gloves to even enter the cleanroom. Being barefoot in a cleanroom for sterile manufacturing is a hard no.

          • rosymind@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’d think the reason for foot protection in a hospital setting is more to protect you from their illnesses, or drop damage (say, a needle or other sharp object)

            I suppose I must confess. I’ve worked in dental, so I’m familair with sterilization proceedures/ ppe. I remember learning to wear hard shoes (hardly any one does in reality) to avoid what I mentioned above

            It’s strange that employees would be barefoot, but I still don’t really see how feet are any more dangerous than any other part of the body, especially given that they’re surely not handling the materials with their feet!

            I can accept that I’m wrong, it just seems strange to highlight the bare feet as a primary issue unless somehow the bacteria in the drops are a type most often found on feet

          • rosymind@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            And now I’m imaging them all in a bus, driving upward from someone’s toes, with a bumper sticker that says:

            “Destination: EyeDrops”

            • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              More like they’re all uncontrollably spreading in the wind like leaves in an autumn storm, landing everywhere.

    • Akisamb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      Most surprisingly, the inspectors observed barefoot employees working in a sterile area of the facility, where they should have been wearing shoes—plus gowns, gloves, and shoe booties. (The barefoot workers were also not wearing gowns or gloves.) A production manager puzzlingly told FDA inspectors that shoeless work is “standard practice.”

      They were supposed to cover everything including the feet.