They’re talking about trunk or treat, where a bunch of cars park in a parking lot and hand out candy from the trunks of the cars. Stop being dense.

It’s also 1110 in Roman numerals.

I guess I missed the part where you’re not free to literally get out of the car and leave?

Edit: the two guys definitely deserve harassment and disturbing the peace charges.

They’re already halfway there /s

I don’t even know who this guy is, but your screenshot plus a quick search says this guy added one forged document to a collection of legitimate documents released from the Heartland Institute. That was certainly not the right thing to do, but let’s at least be fully honest about it.

This reads like a bad faith question, or a question from someone older than like 60.

Who got rid of it, and when??

The convention hasn’t even happened yet? 🤔

Them’s the customers.

"Bruh why would you compare them to the largest surveillance state in the world bro. Saying how the EU would be more like the the most widely-known example of government surveillance and blocking of Internet traffic is just saying China bad, bro.

inb4 “bUt mUriCa bAd ToO”

Yes.

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it!

I keep seeing Usenet mentioned for downloading media, but I’ve never tried it; I’ve stuck with torrents because they’re free and what I’m familiar with. Is paying for Usenet access worth it, is it more straightforward to use with the *arr stack, is there more content available?

Lol

The data doesn’t exist, no other company has a level of “autonomy” that will let your car plow through shit without you paying attention.

Tesla’s self driving appears to be less safe and causes more accidents than their competitors.

“NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation said in documents released Friday that it completed “an extensive body of work” which turned up evidence that “Tesla’s weak driver engagement system was not appropriate for Autopilot’s permissive operating capabilities.”

Tesla bad.

If anyone cared about security, they would use free software.

My bad, thanks for the source!

I think you may be mistaken.

By definition, if the user of the software is not free to do as they wish with the software, the software is not free/libre. It could fit the definition of open source, but it is not free/libre if you are restricting what the user can do with your source code.

And starting comments with “Wrong.” Is just rude.