![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
The executives that say this shit have such a lack of understanding of AI and the kind of work people do daily.
If you’re snooping here, you gotta calm yoself down.
The executives that say this shit have such a lack of understanding of AI and the kind of work people do daily.
You could ask instead of taking a stealthy photo… You do know how to talk to people, right?
So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickle. And in those days nickles had pictures of bumble bees on them! “Give me 5 bees for a quarter” you’d say.
So they aren’t updating the original? Just releasing a new version??
I kinda feel like they’re trying to make me buy the game again.
Yeah I don’t get the argument either. Sounds like some Microsoft-bros not wanting to see a 3rd option for OS’.
Oh a 2-year warranty? Not sure how useful that warranty will be if they continue to deny every warranty claim.
I get that. And I self host the things I care about. But for the average layman? I don’t see self hosting as a real option. Unless you are decently tech savvy, and have an aptitude for troubleshooting, most people aren’t gonna put in the time or effort of initial setup. Even if maintenance is minimal once it’s running. That first leap into self-hosted is daunting.
I think of it this way… would I expect my dad to be able to do it? Absolutely not. And my dad is decently tech savvy for 70.
Churn is inevitable with any subscription service.
The trick is creating just enough value and exclusive content/services that you feel like you’re gonna miss out if you leave. But not too much.
I haven’t seen any incentive to stay with any specific game subscription service via exclusive content or services. But I do see plenty of attempts to lock people into services with shitty tactics. Like forcing save data to the cloud. Good luck moving that saved file to your own personal copy of the game. Or multiple tiered service options with features/games locked behind more expensive options.
It’s all manipulative and anti consumer.
Don’t think they mean sharing data. I think they’re referring to sharing an equally regulated digital environment. That could totally be done without sharing info, but following equal practices.
Really at this point, the lack of regulation is already killing the Internet. Google search isn’t search anymore, it’s ad delivery. Reddit and Facebook are ‘news’ for a huge majority of people. Amazon is essentially the only online retailer people have available, and where other options exist, Amazon uses it’s leverage to make those other experiences just a bit worse. All of these companies use their size and monopolistic weight to prevent competition and by extension worsen consumer options and create worse experiences.
The digital market is doing what any market does, just a lot faster.
Sims 4 released in 2014. They had plenty of time to address bugs in-between the millions of stupid updates, but they didn’t bother. Who honestly expects any real work from these guys at this point?
Rumor based on a tweet which refers to an article from a year ago. This is about as far from substantiated as possible.
Also, next time put what you’re talking about in the title.
As long as it took to get these games on steam, I’ve completely lost interest.
I could also see a database being used to coordinate game ownership with a fraction of the power usage. But neither will happen because consumers always get the raw end of the deal and nothing will ever be done to their benefit without being forced.
Yeah I agree.
We don’t know anything yet.
Bold statement. Might wanna hold judgment till you actually see some gameplay.
Dual CEOs? I feel like I’ve seen this in a comedy somewhere.
What’s healthy for the business long term isn’t healthy for the customer. Remember that.
I have been using my LG OLED TV as my gaming monitor as well for about 2 years now. Haven’t had any issues with burn in on mine. I run the pixel refresh utility once every few months, and typically don’t play a game for more than a 3~4 hour stretch of time, so I think I get enough screen variety that it hasn’t been an issue.
If you haven’t run the Pixel refresher tool, try giving that a go for a few hours and see if it helps with your burn in. It could just be ‘stuck’ and not actually burnt.
As far as the LG, I mainly picked it for the VRR and 4k120 HDR support. Games look great, and It’s also my main TV for movies, which also look great.
This is what happens when we allow gigantic acquisitions.
Does it matter at this point? They lost a lot of interest in this game.