• 1 Post
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 16th, 2023
  • mac@lemm.eetoOpen Source@lemmy.ml•Thunderbird for Android 8.0 Takes Flight - The Thunderbird Blog
    2·
    5 days ago

    Edit: just tried this and it didn’t work. Proton bridge only listens on 127.0.0.1 and doesn’t accept incoming connections due to security concerns.

    If I were in your position, which I am and will probably end up doing this, is vpn into your home network and just connect to the local IP of your bridge server.

    WG tunnel on F droid allows for you to auto connect to your wireguard server when you leave your home net, and auto disconnects when you get back on your home net.

    Personally, I’m unsure if proton bridge listens for external request or if it only accepts requests from localhost? If that’s the case it may be an issue.

  • mac@lemm.eetoFirefox@lemmy.ml•Under a toot announcing that firefox now supports CHIPS (Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State)
    21·
    22 days ago

    i downloaded it after the news the other day. Presently uploading >200gb of pictures.

    Android App has a few quirks, not very snappy, but it looks pretty polished.

    The on device ML seems to be pretty accurate once you start tagging people.

    We’ll see how it handles me throwing the 200gb at it because it was already stuttering a bit when scrolling through ~15gb of pics.

    I havent had the chance to spin up an immich instance yet to compare the two.

    All in all, we might need to wait for a longer term user to chime in, but as of now to me it seems good enough.

    Edit: 2 weeks later. I installed immich on a proxmox node with a rtx 2060 super passed through. it flies compared to ente, which is to be expected as immich isnt e2ee. I will most likely maintain both libraries for now, but Immich is definitely a more complete product.

  • mac@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.ml•Linus Torvalds: Speaks on the Rust vs C Linux Divide
    63·
    2 months ago

    I also dont like videos for this stuff. Summarized using kagi’s universal summarizer, sharing here:

    • The integration of Rust into the Linux kernel has been a contentious topic, with some long-term maintainers resisting the changes required for memory-safe Rust code.
    • The debate over Rust vs. C in the Linux kernel has taken on “almost religious overtones” in certain areas, reflecting the differing design philosophies and expectations.
    • Linus Torvalds sees the Rust discussion as a positive thing, as it has “livened up some of the discussions” and shows how much people care about the kernel.
    • Not everyone in the kernel community understands everything about the kernel, and specialization is common - some focus on drivers, others on architectures, filesystems, etc. The same is true for Rust and C.
    • Linus does not think the Rust integration is a failure, as it’s still early, and even if it were, that’s how the community learns and improves.
    • The challenge is that Rust’s memory-safe architecture requires changes to the existing infrastructure, which some long-time maintainers, like the DRM subsystem people, are resistant to.
    • The Linux kernel has developed a lot of its own memory safety infrastructure over time for C, which has allowed incremental changes, whereas the Rust changes are more “in your face.”
    • Despite the struggles with Rust integration, Linus believes Linux is so widely used and entrenched that alternative “bottom-up grown-up from the start Rust kernels” are unlikely to displace it.
    • Linus sees the embedded/IoT space as an area where alternative kernels built around different languages like Rust may emerge, but does not see Linux losing its dominance as a general-purpose OS.
    • Overall, Linus views the Rust debate as a positive sign of the community’s passion and an opportunity to learn, even if the integration process is challenging.