Knedliky

Maybe it’s “Lichtjahr”? So as long as you stay within 3*10^15km of earth you should be fine 👍

Maybe this research and language is intended to suggest that there is a point past which “confusingly and unintuitively designed” strongly resembles “intentionally deceiving”? We’re probably not going to get internal emails saying “make it complicated so that we can collect users’ data”.

Also, researchers don’t really control how university press departments write up their results. Even less so when they’re interviewed by media.

Addendum: Apple takes great pride in UI and user-centered design, and lately they have been highlighting privacy as a differentiator from Android. Maybe they just dropped the ball, maybe people don’t care, maybe people aren’t very bright. Still, some people have questions:)

I tried to look this up and while there were many many results, none of them seemed to really fit with OP’s question, so would you kindly tell us more about the gay Spock problem?

Germany uses paper ballots. 60 million eligible voters, 3/4 actually voted during the last federal elections.

Very much agree with the first two paragraphs, very much disagree with the third paragraph. “Exceptionally bad”?! Compared to what? I’d say that one or two open world games of the last ten years really stand out but Cyberpunk is comparable to the average. And I would guess it’s quite enjoyable if you already enjoy the cyberpunk genre. Anecdotally, the side quests and side characters seem to elicit very divergent appreciations.

Removed by mod

Woooooooooooosh

Auf den Zauberstab klicken, DOI eingeben, Magieeee. Man kann es mit Word, Latex, etc. kombinieren und damit sehr einfach zitieren. Aber die richtige Magie kommt ganz am Ende, wenn Zotero die Bibliografie von alleine erstellt und formatiert. Sollte deine Unibibo ein Zotero Tutorial anbieten, kann ich das nur empfehlen.

Ok those are really big things. For those really big intimidating things, I found Barbara Oakley’s book/lectures on procrastination quite helpful. I think they are on YT. They helped me get unstuck during my PhD. For the smaller recurring things, let me know if you find a good strategy :) When it’s non-life-changing fun stuff (e.g. music/drawing/crafts), I try to focus on the joy that I get out of even just dicking around instead of how I suck compared to Picasso.

Does it have to do with the difference between one-off tasks and recurring tasks? I’ve asked myself similar questions to yours and sometimes I wonder if tedium is harder to accept when you know that, even if you finish this task today, you’ll have to do it again tomorrow, next week, etc. So why not skip it this once? (We all know it’s never just once)

deleted by creator

Korrektes Zitieren hat nichts mit der Plattform zu tun, über welche du es bezogen hast. Du schreibst ja auch nicht dazu, ob du es auf Papier in deiner Uni oder über Fernleihe oder über die elektronische Autobahn konsultiert hast. Solange du es wirklich konsultiert hast und den Regeln deiner Uni entsprechend zitierst, hast du deine Pflicht gegenüber der Uni und der Wissenschaft erfüllt. Und übererfüllt im Vergleich zu so einigen. Elsevier und Springer werden es überleben. Bonus-Klugscheiß: nur DOI angeben hört sich nach Formalitätenklatsche herausfordern an. Erleichtere dir das Leben, nutze Zotero oder so, die nehmen dir das lästige Formatieren und so ab. Klugscheiß-Genehmigungsnachweis: Doppel-Doktor.