First world problems

Sorry, was writing it from the toilet. Needed to hurry in order to not miss a PBR

Like yes, but undone armpits generate more wealth than the rocket to Mars

Yep. After they started this story they are sucking deep

They were afraid to lose 4% of the audience in Russia and the favor of the Russian government (probably some grants,idk). Now they are afraid to lose those who think that it’s “the right thing to do”.

Btw, it’s not that hard for the Russian government to block every VPN extension like they did with Nord VPN and Surfshark VPN let alone ban Mozilla. This action will help no one and it’s yet another act of virtue signaling

Sounds so painful. We’re integrating AI right N now instead of doing what customers asked us to do or instead of fixing a ton of bugs we have.

I hate corporate

Donated

I have never thought about it

You can say it like this, or you could’ve just written one word…

Clubhouse

Openwrt bricked 2 of my routers. Be careful

“”““might””“”“”

Jokes on you, I don’t believe it today

This joke is funny only if placed in Arnold-Atyah manifold if Kolmogorov-Ramachandran-Yu metric is defined

https://opg.optica.org/ol/fulltext.cfm?uri=ol-49-6-1429&id=547584

You can read their previous papers

Okay, let’s read and find out whether we can find something that we don’t know.

1. There’s no paper, there is no letter, it’s a simple statement at the institute page. The way science is being communicated nowadays is frustrating.

2. From the statement

However, alongside the commercially available C and L-bands, we used two additional spectral bands called E-band and S-band. Such bands traditionally haven’t been required because the C- and L-bands could deliver the required capacity to meet consumer needs.

So they indeed broadened the frequency range.

3. They also did not say anything about limitations. They just pushed this bizarre number everywhere 🤷🏼‍♂️

I don’t understand why, tho I do not have any kind of expertise here.

I suggest (Haven’t read it), this paper proposes to send much denser and broadened signals around one carrier frequency (they use single mode). Due to dispersion they

1. Start to overlap with one each other. If you put more frequencies, you would have more overlaps and I fail to see how it won’t lead to errors.

2. They all arrive at the broader time window, which again could be mitigated either by error correction, or by extending the time window.

It is, but it compromises the speed exponentially with length/broadening

I’m highly suspicious about group dispersion over long distances. Today’s infrastructure was developed for a certain range of frequencies. Broading it right away wouldn’t be applicable that easy - we would need to introduce error correction which compromises the speed multiplier.

Too lazy to get the original paper though

That’s the different kind of lefties. I am talking about tankies that think that Russia and China are socialist states that fight the big imperialist

[interview question]

Assuming a user is a root, can this user create a file that couldn’t be read or deleted by other roots? …by the same user?