• 0 Posts
  • 148 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle

  • Turkish middle school, high school, and university exams are very serious.

    Basically everyone takes the same set of long exams (with a few additions you can add to your standard exam sets, for specialized schools) and when the results come out, you are compared to all other students in the nation.

    Like, think global leaderboards.

    The best universities will outright reject you if your ranking isn’t high enough.

    It’s very intense and cut-throat; so much so that - when I was a young’un growing up in Turkey - I just opted to try my hand at the SATs instead. Ended up going to school abroad.

    The SATs were so easy, compared to the exam prep we did in our Turkish classes, it almost felt like a joke. Though, college tuition costs definitely made sure I wasn’t the one with the last laugh.





  • This is the correct answer, IMO.

    I loved using XMPP back in the day, but I struggled talking with people who weren’t on the same server as me because of spec and client variations.

    While Synapse is a resource hog, it (and Element) - to a certain degree - does the job. Can’t wait until sync v3 lands in the main server.

    The only issue I have is with one friend who insists on deploying his own version of Synapse, but can’t figure out coturn and - as a result - we can’t voice chat properly.

    Goddammit. Two steps forward, one step backward. 😅







  • The not cool parts just relate to any sort of hosted bridge. If you don’t trust them with decrypting messages on their end, then don’t give them your data - there are no bridges capable of doing that, anywhere.

    So it really comes down to “trust someone else with your data, or host it yourself”; and if you’re - understandably - frustrated with those options blame companies like WhatsApp or Discord that make it nigh impossible to integrate their services with outside networks.

    Functionally, these bridges just forward your content to a library acting like a headless client - there’s no way to encrypt that as the reverse engineered clients are not libraries and need to take raw input. You can’t end to end encrypt it as the client is one of the “ends”.

    As an example, the WhatsApp bridge uses WhatsApp web as a backend, and has all the limitations of WA web.

    As a result, I find the expectations to be a bit unrealistic.


  • I am worried about that acquisition, to be honest.

    I’ve been supporting them via Github sponsors for about a year, now - as I only use their open source software; I’ve no intention of touching the service or closed source client.

    As a result, I’d be lying if I didn’t say I was anxious about their new owners basically telling them “hey, why are you releasing all your bridges for free, anyway?”

    Really hope that doesn’t happen, as their bridges have been my primary communication channels for a long time, now. I love not having to keep WhatsApp or Discord installed on my phone.






  • You can use any Matrix client with Beeper, you don’t have to use theirs.

    Regardless, there’s nothing stopping you from recreating the same stack using the available tools.

    What makes their service unique are the bridges. Download their sources, compile them, and then pair them with any server client combo you want.

    If you insist on using their stack, you can still use an OSS client. They chose not to make their client open source as it is, by design, for their service only.

    They’re trying to run a business aimed at people who don’t care about open source, and want the same closed source experience they get from their other chat apps but with inter connectivity between third party services.

    If you want the latter without any closed source code, you can just go and do that. They’ve released all the important parts.

    Edit: Here’s a guide to self hosting beeper.


  • There’s a lot of FUD in this comments section, so I’d like to clear the air. I’m pretty big on OSS myself, so it pains me to see a company doing all the right things get lambasted like this.

    Beeper is just a Matrix server running in tandem with a series of custom, open source bridges written by Beeper. The value proposition is not having to deploy a Matrix server yourself, and not having to deploy each bridge yourself.

    However, if you want to do that you absolutely can. I’ve been running Synapse + a subset of their bridges for a couple years now (the WhatsApp one being the oldest), and they are fantastic.

    The devs contribute back to Matrix all the time and are great about supporting the spec as a responsible third party.

    Their only closed source software is their client, which is - by definition - only written to work with their servers and not generic Matrix servers (e.g. It’s just a preconfigured matrix client which expects each bridge to be deployed, and doesn’t ask you for things like what server you want). As a result, you wouldn’t want to use it with your own stack; you can just pick one of the myriad OSS clients available for Matrix and go with that. I use SchildiChat, for example.

    I don’t understand why, after doing all this work and publishing the source online for free (free as in freedom), they aren’t allowed to offer a preconfigured service to non tech savvy folk?

    Honest question: Shouldn’t they be paid for their work?

    Edit: And, please, stop asking questions like “How do they connect to X/Y/Z, anyway?” - just go read the source and see for yourself. These are the good guys working completely in the open, and you’re treating them as if Twitter just wrote a chat app.