![](https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/8db33aaf-1538-498d-953e-0f8b9357fc8d.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
Thankfully we don’t have to follow the dumb Android security model on desktops.
on Qubes we still have security through compartmentalization, yet all systems have root access (even passwordless sudo)
Thankfully we don’t have to follow the dumb Android security model on desktops.
on Qubes we still have security through compartmentalization, yet all systems have root access (even passwordless sudo)
Many developers sign their AppImages, but its up to you to verify it
Yet curiously they’re far more secure. Huh.
Checksums are not for authenticity, and link me to the docs that indicates that ostree’s optional encryption is enforced in flatpak
Apt or distro package manager of choice.
Wait till you learn that your flatpak client doesn’t verify anything it downloads
R? There’s nothing to read.
As in, it helps people realize the absurdity of monogomy?
Assholes choose not to copyleft. Assholes choose NC licensees too
Making income from open licensing is the only ethical option, though.
You’re not a capitalist because you need to buy food
Yes. And other people should be able to use other people’s work to make derivative works to feed themselves
I prefer more granular control. I appreciate “controversial” and “sort by date” and “top post for past week/month/year”
No, not NC. People should be able to feed themselves for their work
It is a big deal! Its the difference between starving and not
And if you’re dead or incarcerated or otherwise uncontactable?
We shouldn’t throw humans under the bus just to thwart AI. This is not the way.
If they don’t respond to something that lots of folks are asking, then its probably the most important thing to cover in a summary…
Don’t go NC. Authors should be able to sell their work (and derivates too)
No