you can have simple games without predatory monetization. that’s what OP is talking about.
you can have simple games without predatory monetization. that’s what OP is talking about.
ES6 will be fine. Starfield was doomed from the beginning because of the silly space exploration structure.
unless you already played it and want something new.
wasted too much time on starfield, FO76, and mobile games. that’s all they have released since 2018. and if you don’t count VR editions or special editions then you’re back to 2016 with FO4.
8 years of junk. They could have made TWO elder scrolls in that time.
The politics doesn’t belong in the media’s story and world. Like the creator(s) just added it in to push a message.
literally all of literature is created to push a message. who are you to say what “belongs” and what doesn’t? it’s their story.
agreed, there is so much lore more to criticize about this game but of course this is what gets headlines and rage clicks.
I was with you up until the shift away from multiplayer part. I do not see that happening at all, and I don’t even like multiplayer games myself. There’s no denying that more multiplayer has been the trend for the last 30 years, spanning multiple (people) generations, and I don’t see AI changing that.
there is also a causation question. I’m similar to you, I don’t get sick much so I don’t have much reason to be obsessive about cleanliness (of course I am hygienic and practice normal food safety). but my wife gets sick often and that causes her to be extra super careful about foods she eats, cleaning, hand sanitizing, etc.
yeah I would like to leverage AI for stuff like RPG NPCs. instead of hearing the same filler lines for 200 hours of gameplay, barely reacting to the context of your game you could have a vibrant array of endless dialog that actually keeps up with your game progress (or lack thereof).
the golden age of gaming
jfc I hope you reported that app.
I think that is a different feature than what the article is talking about.
or just automatically load my last save please.
yeah regulation enforcing something like this domestically would be nice, but obviously you can’t enforce it internationally. Adversarial states probably have their own GenAI platforms already.
this is also likely explicitly outside their jurisdiction since it involves a federal election
states run federal elections though, plus there are probably local issues on the ballot too. why are police even there if it’s outside their jurisdiction? and how do you expect federal entities to enforce laws at every single poll in the country? it makes no sense.
to me this is just ex-post-facto justification for motivational reasoning or confirmation bias. people just look for the easiest possible way to resolve cognitive dissonance.
yeah and I’ve done a lot of chatting about amazon products online at reddit, forums, etc over the last 20 years or whatever and never once seen people get different prices on the same amazon link.
it doesn’t swing both ways. They are claiming the position of being “pro life” which is clearly hypocritical. No one on the other side is claiming to be “pro death” or “anti life”.
yeah I’m sure there is a contract and/or standard legal processes that covers this situation. I’m just saying I wouldn’t rely on a casual interaction with a store manager to cover my ass legally, all for the benefit of putting Doom on a computer kiosk, or outright taking dozens of DVDs.
agreed. I’m just saying “simple” or “complex” has nothing to do with it.