Because why solve trivial coding problem when experimental bad technology that won’t even work after a many fold increase in implementation time do trick?

As we all know, ai are the best and only solution to complex tasks such as rudimentary file management.

No AI are to this level, are a massive security risk, and none are “smart”.

pay if it’s worth it

It isn’t.

Honestly I was expecting far more downvotes. I posted the video with people like you in mind, who still can think critically are marks without the burden of misinformation and ideology. not being marks.

Ftfy

By the way, if you think you are not subject to ideology, I have several things to sell you.

For anyone else reading: everyone is subject to ideology. The moment you think you arent, that is when you are most trapped by it.

Body weight exercises can build plenty of muscle. You only need specialized muscle targeting once you’re body building. For health body weight exercises are ideal, targeting individual muscles is not as useful to fitness as training many muscles in tandem for common movements.

They just smell nice, your skin is dead and you’re not retrieving anything from it. Just eat the fruits and veggies.

All you really need is the Nyquist frequency of human hearing to know. That’s a good breakdown for audiophiles I’m sure but it is broadly as simple as the Nyquist frequency.

I mean I disagree about not sympathizing with folks somewhat trapped in a hostile software ecosystem, but surely “stand by your beliefs” is not unheard of.

At this point I can only determine you are arguing for the sake of arguing.

Much of what you said is very wrong but it’s not worth arguing about.

Or you know, reducing thermal load by using broadly more efficient capacitors allowing you to shove more current in the car. Or by meeting grid scale requirements for car charging by smoothing out the grid impact of a bunch of charging at once. Or any number of benefits.

Ultimately this certainly benefits car charging. It benefits all electronics. No you won’t be getting two second car charges with this.

Almost every electrical system on the planet uses capacitors. Especially high power systems. Of which evs are.

“No real point in mixing capacitors in with a large battery” ?? That’s done literally all the time for both filtering and for intermittent high power output. Like when I say almost every electrical system uses caps, I mean almost every electrical system.

More of an actual comment, good. More efficient capacitors in both speed and heat certainly helps in charging devices of all sizes. Of course it wouldn’t be charging large batteries in seconds, but that doesn’t mean no improvement.

Why do you feel that the researchers are wrong about their physics research?

Yeah, [arbitrary actor] is [arbitrary relatedness] to [arbitrary person] is always true and not very interesting.

Any given human is approximately 520,000th cousins 70,000th removed from any given chimp.

(5.2E5, 7E4), assuming human generations are approximately 29 years apart, chimps 24, and that it’s stepped, also that we diverged about 13 mya.

Imagine caring how someone eats their food at all tbh

Seems pretty solved as optical illusion and animal scents.

So leave them alone.

Why would librewolf specifically advise that you minimize your extensions to decrease client uniqueness if it had no effect on client uniqueness? Someone’s misinformed, and I don’t think its librewolf.

Packaging is dimes a unit for liquid that is pennies a unit to manufacture. Bulk sales normally are discounted because more unit sales is pretty much always better than more money per unit. This is trivial to prove and us true as long as Pnew-Pold > Pold, literally as long as you aren’t doubling the price, one more unit sale is always better than having increased the price on one unit.

Also bulk packaging is literally cheaper per unit. Companies which do the opposite, charge more for bulk orders, generally are doing so out of the expectation that customers expect the bulk option to be cheaper and are thus tricked into being “double dipped”, they have both spent more per unit and bought more units.

Yes that should always be assumed.

You can get some information of the musculature from the bone structure, attachments are often fairly visible. But fatty tissue and skin, plus the uncertainty of the musculature still, all combine to be fairly high uncertainty ya.