![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
It feeds and evolves a disorder which in turn increases risks of real life abuse.
But if AI generated content is to be considered illegal, so should all fictional content.
It feeds and evolves a disorder which in turn increases risks of real life abuse.
But if AI generated content is to be considered illegal, so should all fictional content.
Yeah no I doubt it
I’ve had mine for two years without burn ins
No, they just calculate with increased size of the training roster… it’s not that complicated. Which is a fair presumption as that is how we’ve increased the predictive precision so far.
Well obviously they cannot rule out techniques no one has though of but likewise they obviously accounted for what they deemed to be within the realm of possibility
What you mentioned is assumed video and paper in question.
The main argument being that no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence.
It clearly isn’t!
A) Man has dreamt of Artificial Intelligence for decades now, often times very much realizing the capabilities (and dangers) of such technology B) AI in its current form already support business, hobbies, creative work etc. The traffic and processing power needed is constantly rising.
I feel with a such a bold (and just incorrect) statement the article cannot be much worth to read.
No, there will be Spyware in the fucking diodes…
Can really recommend Jacket.
Yup, that’d be the joke
Ohhh gottem!
She is now legally obligated to sex this man.
edit: programmers code
Seems to be the correct course of action
Lemmy devs being man children when confronted with GDPR compliance.
And if Lemmy if supposed to better Reddit in basic fucking decency then GDPR is absolutely crucial.
As long as it’s reverse Cramer, anything goes, including shorting.
Yes but Nvidia relies heavily on programmers themselves. Without them Nvidia wouldn’t have a single product. The fact that he despite this makes these claims is worth taking note.
Oh no, but what about the boycott…
Most expensive hospital in the world everyone…
A) Article isn’t available
B) Before the garbage article was taken down, all it did was source an eurogamer article from 2012 when the law changes first where made
C) y’all wasting your time
Laundering? They’re not even entering as investors are they, so they are not really expecting any return other that a presumably finished game at some point?
That’s not how these addictive disorders works… they’re never satisfied and always need more.