I’ve been paying for Premium for quite a long time, it’s good value if you use both Music and YouTube.
Or, you could complain on the Internet.
I’ve been paying for Premium for quite a long time, it’s good value if you use both Music and YouTube.
Or, you could complain on the Internet.
No, but having a handful of people who will never see their ads devalues the whole package.
How? How do they profit off someone who refuses to view ads?
Who would pay for data on a person you can’t advertise to?
I work with fire alarm systems, as others have said, smoke, steam, dust, and even insects inside the detection chamber will trigger a photoelectric smoke det.
I don’t think they’ll care or miss you, to be honest. It’s not like they’re making money off you.
I’d say they did, nobody actively advertises a product they don’t want to sell, unless it’s some type of loss leader.
Of course, you got cheap shoes out of it, so perhaps you both won?
I can’t wait for people to removed incessantly about this for a week, and nothing to happen.
I’ve uninstalled apps because I can’t be arsed finding out how to shut them up before.
The what now? What the hell takes an hour to update on a car?
Buddy, I’ve still got an original Chromecast I use daily.
That’s far less fun than being vauge and condescending on a Web forum though.
So I could move to bumfuck nowhere and get paid to chill out in my car, while my coworkers pick up my slack?
No, that’s Alice’s problem.
It sounds like an incentive not to hire people who live too far away from the office to me.
Because the simplest option for the company is not to hire Bob.
Bob chose to live and work where he does, he can live with the consequences of his choices.
I don’t feel sorry for bob.
Who would hire Bob, in that case?
So either move house or move job then.
They have the choice of paying for the convenience of living close to work, or spending time commuting. That’s not something an employer will or should care about.
Fair enough, I don’t get why paying for just YouTube isn’t an option.