“[T]he court finds that, by reproducing the content of the works (books) in dispute, without the consent of the authors, there has been a violation of the patrimonial copyright of the plaintiffs,” the Court of Appeals added.
You know what else reproduces the content of the works, with or without consent from the authors, a… Monitor.
All those filthy pirates using monitors to read their pirated books. 🤮 They should sue the monitor manufacturers.
Hell, they should sue Microsoft too, for also reproducing the pirated content and allowing them to hit “save” 😡
You know what else reproduces the content of the works, with or without consent from the authors, a… Monitor. All those filthy pirates using monitors to read their pirated books. 🤮 They should sue the monitor manufacturers. Hell, they should sue Microsoft too, for also reproducing the pirated content and allowing them to hit “save” 😡
If ISP’s are liable for piracy, so are power utilities.