"It doesn’t make sense for chocolate bars to be divided into equal-sized chunks when there is so much inequality in the chocolate industry! The unequally-sized chunks of our 6.35 oz bars are a palatable way of reminding Choco Fans and Serious Friends that the profits in the chocolate industry are unequally divided.

And in case you haven’t noticed, the bottom of our bars depicts the West African coastline. The chunks just above it represent the Gulf of Guinea. From left to right, you have Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Togo and Benin (terribly politically incorrect, we know, but we had to combine them to create enough space for a hazelnut), Nigeria and part of Cameroon."

From https://us.tonyschocolonely.com/pages/faqs

  • pixelscript@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have never been in or adjacent to a situation where I had to measure chocolate packaged and sold to be eaten as-is in a recipe by squares broken off of a bar, at the demarcations pre-scored into the bar. If I needed that much control I’d grate it or use a chocolate that came pre-granulated, like baking kisses.

    For chocolate bars meant to be eaten, the score lines are very much for sharability first. Any use of them for culinary measurement is at best a peripheral feature.

    This probably doesn’t hold true for baking chocolate. But Tony’s isn’t baking chocolate.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I didn’t say it was for cooking. I said measurement. That can be applied to consumption as well as in a cooking capacity.

      • pixelscript@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you’re not measuring for cooking, why are you measuring? Being that accurate for casual consumption is strange.