I am shocked. Shocked! /s

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Same,i wish they can make their browser fast and actually private since gecko is slower then chromium (and maybe webkit?) its even worse on windows

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      with how many singular developers managed to do it based on Firefox when Mozilla couldn’t pull their shit together, idk why anyone would still be holding their breath. just switch to a competent fork.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          that’s what’s i said, but they’re all better functioning than firefox

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              but there is a base, and it isn’t good. the forks are. you said you want a good browser. they’re not making it. the forks are good. idk what you’re arguing about.

              • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Most forks take an ESR version and build on top of that. Who is gonna make that ESR base?

                You’re saying the equivalent of ‘I don’t care about the Linux kernel cause Ubuntu is better and everyone should use that’ of arguments.

                Not saying you are literally saying ^

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 hours ago

                  have I said anywhere that Firefox should cease to exist or Mozilla shouldn’t do security patches or whatever because i thought we were talking about having a good browser experience.

                  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    22 hours ago

                    Oooh… Yeah they do provide better OOTB experiences. I don’t even use them and I know that. Sorry.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I understand that they need to diversify so that they’re not so dependent on Google’s default search engine money. I don’t know how they should do that.

      But I’m not sure what they’ve been doing has been all that good of an idea.

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They’re 80% dependent on google there is no choice. Mozilla’s behaviour since they got the google deal was the begining of the end. I honestly believe that due to Mozilla’s current leadership it would be best for open source developers to all refocus on the ladybird project. I don’t have any affiliation to that project and I understand how huge of an undertaking it is to build a web engine from scratch but the gecko engine is polluted by the Mozilla’s execs and by extension Google.

        To make it clear Google controls Firefox by, in practice, owning an 80% share of Mozilla.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        well paying execs multimillion dollar salaries aint helping thats for sure!

        Also. What’s the point of their mastodon server? It’s cool but so what

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        make their browser engine useable for 3rd parties and sell support, make an electron-like product and add premium features… there are so many browser-based products that people sell, and owning 1 of the only viable browser engines should be huge… the fact that firefox is still only barely able to be embedded is a travesty

        it’d be especially valuable if they made a premium electron product that provided security/privacy guarantees, performance benefits, etc - they should siphon some of the profit off the number of for-profit companies that build electron apps

        • Eiri@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I kinda like the idea but I also kinda hate it.

          I really wish PWAs worked properly cross-platform instead. :(

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            totally agree, but also you can do more with an electron-like app - elevated privileges, less sandbox, etc because the user expects such things from an installed “native” app

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            SSB was killed after it sat behind an about:config flag, then their telemetry (that most power users disable) reported folks weren’t using. But what average users would be using a setting they would need to poke around to find. It’s a real shame too since I want to say it was PeppermintOS that was largely built around PWAs.