• lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    14 days ago

    Wow… While the action is ethically crappy, I never would have thought that to be an arrestable offense. Using the actresses to generate new nudes and porn scenes? Sure, but to literally cut out the nude scenes from real movies? Kind of crazy to get arrested for that without some sort of warning or cease and desist letter first.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, an arrest for something that would be generally understood to be fair use is a lot.

      I can see the case for “that’s not fair use”. I’m not necessarily convinced either way. But an arrest?

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 days ago

      A porn company could make the same, out-of-context argument just to slap an extra charge onto the arrest. That 2 minutes of badly acted exposition was a critical reason why she’s taking cocks in 3 holes. It’s really a lovely scene you turned into pure filth!

    • 101@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I am very shocked for the whole thing,This is a very bad precedent.

      The man literally did something that the website itself allows by default (by allowing the subreddit) the one at fault here is Reddit, not the man himself. They are the ones who should deal with the consequences.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Ehhhhh… that’s a pretty shit take. Any site that allows uploads of files “allows” uploads of CSAM? See how that breaks down immediately?