• Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    Won’t take that long, security researchers are already decompiling the update to see if it was malicious or incompetence.

    • Balinares@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      You won’t find the incompetence in the software no matter what.

      If you fail to assume that the software contains issues – if you fail to understand that your software is made by humans and humans make mistakes, not because they’re bad but because they’re human – and if you fail to implement mechanisms to feel gracefully with inevitable failures, THAT is the incompetence.

      Failures are systemic.

      • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh yes I make those failures myself, testing and staging and limited release schedules save my human failures from breaking the world

        • Balinares@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          One funny thing about humans is that they aren’t just gloriously fallible: they also get quite upset when that’s pointed out. :)

          Unfortunately, that’s also how you end up with blameful company cultures that actively make reliability worse, because then your humans make just the same amounts of mistakes, but they hide them – and you never get a chance to evolve your systems with the safeguards that would have prevented these.