It peaked at 4.05% in March. The last 2 months it went just below 4% as the Unknown category increased. For June the reverse happened, so 4.04% seems to be the real current share of Linux on Desktop as desktop clients were read properly/werent spoofed.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I am still hoping it will hit 10% market share within my life time. I remember when it was predicted to hit that in 2010, obviously it didn’t happen*. Of course for me personally, the year of the Linux Desktop was 2007 when I was finally able to use it as my main OS at home, I tried it before many times since 2003.

    * not counting systems that use the Linux kernel but aren’t considered a traditional GNU+Linux desktop.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      not counting systems that use the Linux kernel but aren’t considered a traditional GNU+Linux desktop.

      Does that mean you don’t count Alpine towards Linux market share? It mostly doesn’t use any GNU stuff.

      You can also compile the kernel with LLVM instead of gcc, use musl instead of glibc, and use BSD coreutils instead of GNU coreutils.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago
        not counting systems that use the Linux kernel but aren’t considered a traditional GNU+Linux desktop.
        

        Does that mean you don’t count Alpine towards Linux market share? It mostly doesn’t use any GNU stuff.

        not OP, but my guess is that he was referring to android

      • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Do they use the BSD userland instead? Interesting…

        Perhaps the definition isn’t good enough or accurate. What would you call a system that perhaps uses Darwin kernel or Hurd plus GNU user land, or any combo of.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Do they use the BSD userland instead? Interesting…

          I think Alpine uses Busybox, but it’s feasible for a Linux distro to use BSD coreutils. Not sure if any do that, though.