• Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Looking at it most favorably, if they ever want to not be dependent on Google, they need revenue to replace what they get from Google and like it or not much of the money online comes from advertising. If they can find a way to get that money without being totally invasive on privacy, that’s still better than their current position.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      In my view that isn’t favorable. It is perhaps real, but it still doesn’t sit well as we know where it likely leads.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        most people are stupid. you and I don’t click on ads, sure, but how do you think google got all their money? you have to cater to the idiots.