• zaph@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    To me it sounds the exact same. The language doesn’t say “printed propaganda that doesn’t have a lot of nuance” it just says publications.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, but if you tried to explain TikTok to the ruling judge on the 1965 case, I think their head would explode. The ruling isn’t some all powerful precedent that shuts down the ban before the suit can begin, it’s old and outdated. Something like TikTok was not even getting theorized at the time, you can’t seriously expect it to be treated the same way.