• g0nz0li0@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see how market consolidation benefits consumers. I’m not sure that I understand the point you are making?

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Without something significant to move the needle back toward Microsoft, Sony will be the de facto high-end console manufacturer, which isn’t good for consumers.

        • g0nz0li0@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand the point you are making, but combating market consolidation with more market consolidation doesn’t help consumers in the long term.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree, but short of legislating out the ability for exclusivity deals, I don’t know what else could be done.

            • g0nz0li0@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t like exclusivity deals and platform fragmentation either, I think it’s anti-consumer. But to be fair I don’t think the Microsoft deal is just about that.

              Microsoft’s market cap is something like 23x that of Sony’s; the reason they are in 3rd place is entirely down to mismanagement. It’s pretty typical for Microsoft to find themselves in this position in many of the markets they have chosen to occupy over the decades, and so they instead use their deep pockets to buy their way to being market leaders. Microsoft have a long history of using acquisitions to buy out or block competitors, to the detriment of the market.

              We saw what happened when Microsoft got a whiff of success in the 360 era. The Xbox One was anti-gamer and anti-consumer, and it didn’t happen by accident: that’s straight out of Microsoft’s playbook.

              The increased competition might be nice in the short term, but it gives Microsoft an opportunity to disproportionately influence the gaming industry for decades into the future imo.

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not the other person but no. Microsoft really needs more exclusive games to their system. I
      Want the three major systems to do well because that means there’s lots of good games to play. But it seems microsoft have forgotten about making good games leading consumers to choose Sony.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sucks, but gamers buy consoles for the exclusives. PS has way better exclusives and look how much better it sells.

          If Xbox doesn’t start doing decent exclusives, it’ll cease to exist as a platform and we’ll only have PS and Switch left.

          Basically, if Microsoft doesn’t do anti-competitive things, they get punished by the free market. It sucks, because I LOVE the fact that Xbox games come out on PC day 1 now, buuuuuuut that’s gonna be no good for Xbox market share.

          • wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            How about we stop trying to force players to live in our walled garden and just try to sell software? The top three platforms are all just PCs anyway at this point.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hah, good one.

              All of the platforms make most of their money from digital market fees. Consoles themselves are loss-leaders I believe (at least they used to be). Each of them wants you to be stuck in their platform. Steam has the weakest grip of them all, because you can just go buy your games from another store, but luckily for them, the only other store that’s even halfway decent is GOG.

              There’s very little that can be done about the whole damn thing unless either the EU or the US decides to force console manufacturers to open up their platforms to 3rd party stores. Which, to be clear, I would absolutely love. But I doubt it’s going to happen.

              • wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’ve got the solution backwards. We don’t need ps5 to allow a third party store. The hardware is just another pc, any proprietary accelerators for inline decompression or not.

                The solution is them releasing a store on other operating systems there’s nothing keeping them from releasing their apis and game engines in windows or Linux so they can easily release the ps5 store for general purpose PC.

                I agree that this will never happen. Being pro consumer removes their control over said consumer. They’re stuck in the 80s mindset that came out after the atari debacle. Lock it down to block any and all outside innovation and police the platform to stamp out any competition that may profit off of their effort.

                Steam is as open as it is because gaben has a hard limit on anti consumer lock in. There’s no steam exclusivity because steam itself doesn’t have any only steam for x years because money policy. That comes directly from the top.

                Epic’s bullshit one year exclusivity trash caused a backlash that I still haven’t forgotten. No amount of free games will let a lot of us allow that camel’s nose into our tent.