Nice demonstration of why mastodon’s dominance is problematic

See the conversions here:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/4628
and
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/federating-the-content-of-posts-note-articles-and-character-limits/4087

AFAICT, mastodon’s decisions, which are arguably problematic (on which see: https://lemmy.ml/post/14973403) are literally trickling down to other platforms and infecting how they federate with each other as they dance around mastodon’s quirks in different ways.

It seems like masto is ruining “the standard” with its gravity.

#fediverse #mastodon
@fediverse

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    13·
    6 months ago

    From the PR:

    Note that this behaviour is configurable. It’s default is a 500 char limit because that is the Mastodon default.

    That’s a shit default, and a shitty way to treat a standard that is meant for all sorts of communication. ActivityPub is not Twitter, and it is not just for short-form communication. In fact, a majority of the web is longer-form communication that isn’t a mere 500 characters long.

    Retorting with “this behaviour is configurable” is dancing around the issue. Good, sane defaults mean everything in programming.