• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers

    • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Sure but at least from my experience if the desktop hardware doesn’t support Windows we are already talking about a very obscure type of hardware that isn’t going to be mass deployed to the general public that would affect this user agent statistic.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The thing with Windows is that you are dependent on the Manufacture to make drivers for the device. Windows supports nothing out of the box. You can see this if you install Windows stock on a device with no internet. Granted that’s very uncommon but depending on the manufacture for support is a mixed bag sometimes.

        • pathief@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure but that’s a really really narrow scope. Hardware is designed to work with Windows first. It’s unfortunate but it is what it is and saying hardware support is bad on windows is misleading.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just know from experience with obscure hardware. You can’t run Windows on your router and Windows 11 doesn’t support serial connections.