wnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 11 months agoSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkSuperconductor Breakthrough Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testingwww.tomshardware.comwnose@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 11 months agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareNecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI’ve heard that fusion reactors become slightly more viable with room temperature superconductors, is that true or no?
minus-squareHumbleHobo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.
I’ve heard that fusion reactors become slightly more viable with room temperature superconductors, is that true or no?
I think most everything is better with superconductors, because there’s less worry about stray electricity or heat causing unnecessary failures.