• picassowary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Bethesda has a strong track record though” i mean… do they?

    their games sell a lot of units but i can’t remember any time since morrowind that they launched a game that received widespread praise for anything other than its technical merits, and i say this as someone who still dips back into heavily modded TES games a few times a year :/

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Morrowind: 89 on Metacritic
      Oblivion: 94
      Fallout 3: 91
      Skyrim: 94
      Fallout 4: 84

      PC scores, for consistency. There are plenty of better games out there, but most AAA studios would kill for that kind of consistently good-but-not-quite-legendary track record.

      • picassowary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        oh yeah the metacritic scores are good but i was referring to audience reception about characters, narrative, etc

        fallout 3 in particular is a fun one because once people started beating it there was a general upswell of “what the fuck was that?” that was loud enough that we got a changed ending in DLC :)

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been a while since they’ve actually released one of their mainline games. I don’t really count TES:O and FO:76 as IIRC neither had the normal dev teams working on them.

      Im cautiously optimistic about it all, but am obviously going to wait for reviews.

      • picassowary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        the thing for me about starfield is that most of the game looks like a reskin of games i’ve already played (no man’s sky, elite dangerous) and the parts that don’t look like mainline bethesda fare but In Space, so my general vibe about starfield is pretty dismal

        would be absolutely stoked for it to turn out well though. more games in space = good

    • Chailles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What exactly do you think merits a strong track record then? If a series of games consistently over the course of 20 years being highly regarded, still being played, still growing with active communities, and selling extremely well for nearly every single title you made isn’t a “strong track record,” then who can claim that right?

      It’s not even like other game franchises which “just sell a lot of units” like sports games which tend to not do anything with their formula and release the same game but worse yearly.