There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will give credit to Apple on that one because android phone manufacturers are now supporting their phone for longer because of how long Apple is supporting them.

    • sirjash@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the more probable reason is that EU regulators were unhappy with this for a long time and have now put 3 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates into law. Low cost Android manufacturers don’t care what Apple does.

    • kayazere@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But for their laptops the support has dropped to the lowest in years. Some intel MacBooks no longer get the latest version after 6 years.

    • skulblaka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember back in the day when I had apple devices where they would push updates for devices long past their capability to actually run the updated software. Rather than refuse the update or get a pruned patch with security fixes only, it would force updates and bloat your phone and grind it into unresponsive unusability after a few years.

      I hear that’s not so much the case anymore, so that’s nice. But I remember. The main reason I upgraded my phone was because of that, the hardware was great, but I could hardly use the software anymore even after clean installs.

      My point being, I guess, extended support is great if managed properly but it can also become a bludgeon with which to drive you toward the new generations of devices.

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        long past their capability to actually run the updated software

        Well, Apple intentionally slowed those devices down to make the users update, instead of using an insecure device, that would’ve provided a good experience otherwise.

        And these days Apple is retiring devices arbitrarily for profits too. For example this year they are retiring the Iphone 8, which has better hardware, than the ipad 2018 that is still being supported…

        • bedrooms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That slowness was, at least officially, for the battery health. Do you have the support to prove otherwise?

          • supercheesecake@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            These conversations bring the weirdest people out of the woodwork. I remember talking with a guy who explained to me how crap Apple laptops were because you (according to him) can’t customise them. Turns out he’d never owned or even used an Apple laptop. I was like, why do you care?! Especially about something you have no experience with!

            • bedrooms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The problem is that those people often can’t read. Everyone has a biased opinion or two they forgot to back up with support, but those people can’t be argued with. I want to know how to talk with them.

          • Sina@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually yes. I bought a brand new -discounted old stock- Iphone 4s for my mum near the end of the ios 8 cycle. The day before we installed ios 9 on it, it had okay performance and good battery life. Following the update to ios9 the performance went to complete shit. (the battery remained usable for 2 more years after, but it was not a good experience for her)