• V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    In practice not really. Linux is great on servers or specialized workstations, but for general end users it just doesn’t work out. I could get into why, but it essentially boils down to support and compatibility.

    I migrated our company from Windows to RedHat and Macs, but I wouldn’t put macOS on a server* nor would I put RHEL on a sales guy’s laptop.

    *except things like build servers.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Annecodotally I have run it for 7 years including high end CAD. it has been much more stable and predictable than Windows.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just installed Mint on my personal desktop. So far it’s pretty solid and I’m not missing anything from windows. A little bit of glitchiness but not bad. And while I’m a developer, I’m not exactly a Linux power user - outside of basic directory commands, I have to Google anything.

      All I’m saying is from the end user perspective it’s fine other than Firefox tabs crash on me from time to time. Idk about from a provisioning or management standpoint.

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Provisioning isn’t bad, management isn’t either. I actually prefer it in regards to Windows, but I am very biased. Ansible and Satellite is the chef’s kiss IMO, but people make strong points against it. I personally use Fedora and macOS, I totally get the comfy feeling Linux can give.

    • Wouldn’t a RHEL or similar distro which offers enterprise support be a good solution? Also, tech folks are very comfy on Linux as it’s how the internet basically operates. A distro with enterprise support and fully functional GUI that’s similar to windows seems like a solid solution to move from windows. What makes you hesitant to run RHEL on a sale employees computer?

      • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firstly, because the sales guys aren’t technical. They are smart, but not computer smart. The value proposition of having them learn GNOME to do work would never fly with the suits. The big Cs would rather eat the capex and just give them Macs and never hear about it again. I also greatly enjoy not having to help the important ones with pressing technical issues. As far as GNOME has come, it isn’t a replacement for Aqua or Explorer just yet. It’s a death-by-a-thousand paper-cuts situation that still has a ways to go.

        Additionally, workstation RHEL also isn’t quite as bulletproof as the server variant. Such is the nature of the Linux graphics stack. We had a kiosk PC fail to boot to graphical target two weeks back because of an update that nuked dbus. It was just a Grafana kiosk so who cares really. Hasn’t happened again since, but it shakes confidence you know? The servers, however, have been minimal in their issues. I think the only major issue we ran into this year was libvirt imploding on an on-prem server. The post-mortem was interesting on that one.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        When your app vendors write their apps for Windows, no. You could try moving everything in Citrix or VDI, but then you’re still running Windows and doing it with more costs.