• redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really? Then that’s a rather confusing name. I don’t engage there, but what I got from them is rather an “against” movement, whereas unionists usually have an agenda to strive towards.

    • minorninth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The name is confusing, kind of like “defund the police”. If you take it at face value, you can misunderstand.

      Look at https://lemmy.ml/c/antiwork 's sidebar:

      We’re trying to improving working conditions and pay.

      We’re trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

      We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

      • kibiz0r@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a leftist movement doesn’t have a horribly misleading and unnecessarily inflammatory name, is it even a leftist movement?

        • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean the creator of the movement back on reddit was literally anti-work. They went on to get interviewed on the news and made a complete fool of themselves and the people who had a much more well reasoned approach, causing a split into “work reform”/worker empowerment communities, which this one is more along the lines of.