Title

  • xthedeerlordx@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “There are rumours that Meta would become “Fediverse compatible”. You could follow people on Instagram from your Mastodon account”

    Are there examples of this? Or is this just the fear? This all seems like a knee jerk reaction to something we are already avoiding by being on Lemmy/mastodon. The point of having decentralized instances isn’t popularity. It’s to avoid the corporate bullshit, which is inherently less popular.

    • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If any instance becomes large enough to have an undue influence, which Meta would likely have, then they effectively control the entire ecosystem. At that point, it effectively stops being decentralized (See: The 51% Attack, although this wouldn’t happen at a certain number/ratio). When it becomes convenient to them, they can pull the plug, and destroy the rest of the ecosystem that isn’t theirs.

      It’s exactly what happened with XMPP and Google Talk.

        • Terrasque@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          XMPP was and still is a buggy mess, and the reason Google unlinked it was that while it had a fraction of the legit traffic, it was like 80% of trolling and spam and other crap.

          And Google killed xmpp? No, xmpp killed xmpp, if you can kill something that’s already dead.

          People started using other networks because they got used to

          1. Messages arriving
          2. Messages being readable by the recipient
          3. Media like images actually being shown properly.

          With xmpp messages frequently got lost with no error, different clients having different encryption and encoding settings, different ways to encode and decode media… A complete mess.

          People using that as an EEE example are clueless, or stupid.

          Also, if meta starts federating, it will eventually stop it for the same reason Google stopped talking with other xmpp servers. Because it’ll be the source of most of the crap, but very little legit content.

        • ErwinLottemann@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, because it was a decentralized messaging protocol, like ActivityPub. The problem in the end was not the ‘OG’ XMPP Users but the new Google Talk users and how Google treated the protocol. This, theoretically, could happen with ‘the fediverse’, too.