Insights into the kind of crap 78-rpm records were made of, and other scarce technical infos.

If you’re not sure what ‘a record’ is, or haven’t ever seen one, you’re excused.

Oh, and by-the-way, 78 is the approximate number you get when you rotate a 46-tooth gear with a 3600 rpm motor. (60 cycles per second.)

Further wisdom such as this is found by the ton here: http://www.78rpmrecord.com/links.htm

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not many vinyl heads still around.

    Playing 78’s is a niche within a niche.

    • madsen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vinyl has, AFAIK, been gaining a lot in popularity over the last 20 years. The last few years pressing plants have had trouble keeping up with demand — in part due to supply chain issues, but also because everyone and their grandma wants vinyl pressed.

      • kalkulat@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a great service. I found several of his expertly-created 78 tunes on there that I hadn’t heard in decades. (Some scarce stuff is almost never NOT available on 33 or 45rpm)

        Another reason: Some people get deeper into multiple pieces of music because they like to compare performances of them. Fidelity doesn’t matter a whole lot. You want to compare how some bands or singers performed a (non-hit) song recorded in the 1930s or 1950s. You listen around the fidelity. People in the 1950s made million-selling hits everyone heard on AM radio or 45s. Fidelity is over-rated.